IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring
This case involves an application in probate for the fees and expenses of attorneys Mary Katherine Longworth and Peggy J. S. Monger (“the Attorneys”) arising out of their representation of Thomas S. Harvey, the former executor of the Estate of Lillie Mae Porter (“the Estate”). Being dissatisfied with the probate court’s award, the Attorneys appealed. For the reasons stated herein, we vacate the judgment of the lower court and remand for further proceedings. |
Loudon | Court of Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Adoption of Brian Dustin Copeland & Savannah Copeland Marie Graham & John Graham vs. Timothy Copeland
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
Al-Fatlawy vs. Doe and Chicago Insurance Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Fahey vs. Eldridge
|
Wilson | Court of Appeals | |
Jackson vs. Jackson
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Gibson vs. Trant, et al
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Davis vs. Holland, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Wheeler vs. TDOC
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Robinson vs. Nissan Motor Mfg. Corp., USA
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
State Dept. of Children's Svcs. vs. Hunter
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Ann King, et al vs. Danek Medical Inc., et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-01965-C0A-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Darron Smith vs. Ed Mullikin
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Simonton vs. Huff
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Burress vs. Sanders
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Suntheimer vs. Suntheimer
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Jones vs. Ewell
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Brown vs. Brown
|
Franklin | Court of Appeals | |
Thurman Deshazer vs. Ferrell Paving
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Dianne Fisher vs. Isaac Fisher
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Monroe Davis vs. State of Tennessee
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Scott vs. Ashland Healthcare Center
|
Cheatham | Court of Appeals | |
Ronald Collier v. Jack Morgan
This appeal involves an inmate seeking to purse a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against two prison officials. The Circuit Court for Hickman County dismissed the inmate’s claim for failure to comply with Tenn. Code Ann. § 41-21-805 (1997). On this appeal, the inmate asserts that the trial court erred by dismissing his complaint and by declining to grant his request for a temporary injunction. We affirm the dismissal of the inmate’s suit in accordance with Tenn. Ct. App. R . 10(b).1 |
Hickman | Court of Appeals |