COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Mobile Living, Inc., v. J. Michael Tomlin and Aubrey Earl Gregeory, et al.
01A01-9809-CH-00466
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

This case is before the court on interlocutory appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County under Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 9. The trial court order granting the interlocutory appeal presents a single issue: "1. Whether the defendant Gregory's affirmative defenses of waiver, laches and estoppel, abandonment, and breach of duty of good faith and fair dealing are matters of law to be decided by the court and not material facts in dispute, which would be decided by the jury in the case."

Davidson Court of Appeals

TN Downs vs. William Gibbons
02A01-9812-CH-00379
Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.

Shelby Court of Appeals

Jennifer Kensinger vs.s James Kensinger
02A01-9811-CV-00322
Trial Court Judge: James F. Russell

Shelby Court of Appeals

Valerie Humphries vs. Plant Maint.
02A01-9811-CV-00323
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Shelby Court of Appeals

Brennco Inc. vs. Chattanooga Better Housing Comm.
E2000-01508-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Frank Brown, III
Plaintiff's action for an order restraining defendant from demolishing plaintiff's buildings was ultimately dismissed, after plaintiff failed to meet conditions set by the Court to keep the restraint in place. On appeal, we affirm.

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Memphis Housing vs. Tara Thompson
02A01-9812-CV-00356
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Lanier

Shelby Court of Appeals

State/Carolyn Collier vs. Ephram Collier
02A01-9901-JV-00027
Trial Court Judge: J. Roland Reid

Haywood Court of Appeals

Nichols vs. Nichols
03A01-9810-CV-00352

Court of Appeals

03A01-9811-CH-000380
03A01-9811-CH-000380

Court of Appeals

Paula Marie Brown, v. James A. Brown - Concurring
03A01-9812-CV-00417
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge L. Marie Williams

I concur i themajority opinion. I agree that the majority's approach to determining gross income for current child support is correct in this case. I write separately to express my view that the two-year-average approach utilized by the majority in this case may not be appropriate in all cases.

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Byrd vs. Gibson
03A01-9901-CV-00022

Court of Appeals

Thompson vs. Telco
01A01-9801-CH-00045
Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell

Williamson Court of Appeals

Hosale vs. Warren
01A01-9810-CV-00523
Trial Court Judge: Hamilton V. Gayden, Jr.

Davidson Court of Appeals

In Re: Annie Christina Harris
01A01-9901-CV-00017
Trial Court Judge: Royce Taylor

Rutherford Court of Appeals

Eatherly vs. Eatherly
01A01-9806-CV-00314
Trial Court Judge: Bobby H. Capers

Wilson Court of Appeals

Smith vs. Smith
01A01-9809-CH-00515
Trial Court Judge: Henry Denmark Bell

Williamson Court of Appeals

03A01-9809-CV-00312
03A01-9809-CV-00312

Court of Appeals

Behm vs. Behm
03A01-9810-CH-00339

Loudon Court of Appeals

Phung vs. Case
03A01-9811-CV-00388

Anderson Court of Appeals

Phung vs. Case
03A01-9811-CV-00388

Anderson Court of Appeals

Bok vs. State
03A01-9812-BC-00426

Court of Appeals

Hart vs. Tourte
03A01-9901-CH-00004

Knox Court of Appeals

Brown vs. Brown
03A01-9812-CV-00417

Court of Appeals

Cannon vs. City of Chattanooga
03A01-9901-CV-00023

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Charles Conner vs. Cynthia Conner
02A01-9809-CH-00251
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

Shelby Court of Appeals