Cantrell vs. In the Matter of: Estate of Jerry A. Cantrell
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Brown vs. Brown
|
Marion | Court of Appeals | |
Kincaid vs. Kincaid
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Marshall vs. Jackson & Jones Oils, Inc.
|
Rutherford | Court of Appeals | |
Dianne Dobson/Husband vs. State
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1998-00535-COA-R3-CV
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
Jerry Duncan Ford, Inc. v. J. Roy Frost, d/b/a Frost Construction Company
This case is a consolidation of three breach of contract actions, each of which arose out of disputes regarding major renovations and additions to a commercial building in Harriman housing an automobile dealership owned by Jerry Duncan Ford, Inc. (“Jerry Duncan Ford”). Jerry Duncan Ford filed an action against the general contractor in charge of the project, J. Roy Frost, doing business as Frost Construction Company (“Frost”), after terminating Frost’s services because of unsatisfactory performance. Frost in turn filed an action against Jerry Duncan Ford for breach of contract. The third action was filed by Customer Service Electric Supply, Inc. (“Customer Service”), against Jerry Duncan Ford, Frost, M. Jerry Duncan (“Mr. Duncan”), and Judy C. Duncan (“Judy Duncan”), seeking payment for certain exterior light fixtures that it had installed at the dealership. After a bench trial, the court awarded Jerry Duncan Ford damages reflecting the difference between the total cost of the construction and $313,200, a “ceiling” that -- as found by the trial court -- Frost had guaranteed. The trial court also awarded Customer Service damages against Frost, but denied the former’s request for a judgment against Jerry Duncan Ford and the Duncans. Frost appeals, raising the following issues for our consideration: |
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
Sullivan County, Tennessee and The Sullivan County Building Commissioner v. Joe Ellis Lyon
This appeal arises out of the trial court’s entry of an “agreed” order ostensibly resolving a dispute between plaintiffs Sullivan County and the Sullivan County Building Commissioner (collectively “the County”) and defendant Joe Ellis Lyon (“Lyon”). Lyon appeals, arguing that he did not consent to the entry of the order. We find and hold that the order should not have been entered. |
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-01192-COA-R3-CV
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Sarah High vs. James High
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
Andrei Mihut vs. Maria Mihut
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
In Matter of: Tamika Baker, etc.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-01963-COA-R3-CV
|
Blount | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-01980-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Thomas Fowler vs. Maxine Middlecoff
|
Fayette | Court of Appeals | |
Tamara Emison vs. Randy Emison
|
Crockett | Court of Appeals | |
Blaylock/Brown Const. vs. Collierville Bd.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W1999-02022-COA-R3-CV
|
Decatur | Court of Appeals | |
JC Penney Nat'l Bank vs. Johnson
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Simonton vs. Huff
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Kenning vs. HCA Health Services of TN, Inc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Jones vs. HCA Health Services of TN, Inc.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Minton vs. Long
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Price-Luttrell vs. Luttrell
|
Coffee | Court of Appeals | |
Hoalcraft vs. Smithson
|
Williamson | Court of Appeals |