COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

Mitchell L. Darnall, v. A+ Homecare, Inc., and James Bradley Smith, et al. - Concurring
01A01-9807-CV-00347
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.

The court has correctly affirmed the summary judgment dismissing Mr. Darnall’s Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-304 (Supp. 1998) claim. Even though I concur with the court’s decision, I have prepared this separate opinion to state my understanding of the elements of a Tenn. Code Ann. § 50-1-304 claim. I find this restatement necessary because of the Western Section’s reliance on Johnson v. St. Francis Hosp., Inc., 759 S.W.2d 925 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1988) in Merryman v. Central Parking Sys., Inc., No. 01A01-9203-CH-00076, 1992 WL 330404 (Tenn. Ct. App. Nov. 13, 1992) (No Tenn. R. App. P. 11 application filed).

Planet Rock vs. Regis Ins.
02A01-9807-CV-00218
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

02A01-9712-GS-00298
02A01-9712-GS-00298
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

Advanced Sales vs. Wilson Co.
01A01-9805-CH-00245
Trial Court Judge: C. K. Smith

Little Six Corporation vs. Ruth Johnson, Commissioner
01A01-9806-CH-00285
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Buford vs. Cunningham
01A01-9806-CH-00325
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Jenny C. Walker vs. James M. Walker
M2001-00087-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano
After the parties separated, the husband borrowed a substantial amount of money to complete the renovation of marital property and to pay household expenses. The trial court divided the marital property pursuant to divorce, classifying the husband's post-separation loans as marital debt. The wife argues on appeal that the trial court erred in its classification and division of the post-separation debts. We affirm the trial court.

Southers vs. Southers
03A01-9802-CV-00001

STS/BAC Joint Venture v. The City of Mt. Juliet
M2003-00171-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Patricia J. Cottrell
Trial Court Judge: Charles K. Smith
The developer of a planned Wilson County subdivision sought damages for a temporary taking, claiming that the City of Mt. Juliet interfered with the completion of the project by arbitrarily refusing to grant necessary permits. The trial court granted summary judgment to Mt. Juliet, in part on the ground that the statute of limitations had passed on the developer's claim for relief. We affirm.

Amy Decker vs. Carroll Academy
02A01-9709-CV-00242
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn

Tabor vs. Eakin
03A01-9902-CV-00043

C&C Aluminum Builders Supply vs. Rynd
01A01-9804-CH-00225
Trial Court Judge: John W. Rollins

Lessley vs. Shope
01A01-9805-CV-00233
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano

In the Matter of: M.C.G.
01A01-9809-JV-00461
Trial Court Judge: Andrew J. Shookhoff

Hennigan vs. Hennigan
01A01-9807-CH-00380
Trial Court Judge: Tyrus H. Cobb

Lautenbach vs. Lautenbach
01A01-9710-CH-00595
Trial Court Judge: Leonard W. Martin

Damron vs. Media General et al
01A01-9805-CV-00251
Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell

Forklift Systems vs. Werner Enterprises
01A01-9804-CH-00220
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Mason et al vs. Metro Development
01A01-9806-CH-00283
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Davis vs. Inman, et al
01A01-9706-CH-00254
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton

Estate of Bonnie Spalding
02A01-9807-PB-00183
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Benham

Marcus vs. Marcus
02S01-9804-CH-00036

Nancy Knight vs. Henry Knight
02A01-9804-CH-00094

) Hon. F Rank v. Will Iams, Iii
03101-9807-CH-00239

Krista Miller vs. Frederick Miller
02A01-9809-CH-00271
Trial Court Judge: John Walton West