R. E. Sharp, Jr. vs. Campbell Co. Bd. of Education & Campbell Co., TN
|
Campbell | Court of Appeals | |
John Constantine, II et al vs. Miller Ind., Inc. et al
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
State ex rel Jerry N. Estes vs. Johnny Dewayne Hicks
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-02107-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Robert Bowman, et al vs. Gatlinburg Condo Mgt.
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
E1999-1531-COA-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals | ||
E1999-2339-COA-R3-CV
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
F. G.Sutton vs. J.W. Sutton
|
Court of Appeals | ||
William A. Harvey vs. Lenoir City Utilities Board
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Deborah Ann Holland vs. Jason Keith Holland
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Basily vs. Rain, Inc., et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Crowell vs. Brown
|
Humphreys | Court of Appeals | |
Davis, et al vs. Eubanks and DHS
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Estate of Divinny vs. Wheeler Bonding Co.
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Frances Jean Hernandez v. Philip Andreus Hernandez
The appellant owned an undivided one-third interest in a residence prior to his marriage to the appellee. They occupied the residence for about two years, during which time the evidence reveals that the appellee engaged herself in constant repairs, thereby increasing the liveability and value of the residence. She was awarded 75% of the increase in the value of this residence during the marriage, of which the appellant complains. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Amos vs. Vanderbilt
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
In Re: Adoption of Brian Dustin Copeland & Savannah Copeland Marie Graham & John Graham vs. Timothy Copeland
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9904-CV-00133
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9904-CV-00133
|
Sullivan | Court of Appeals | |
Dean vs. Compton
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
M1999-00468-COA-R3-CV
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Lilly vs. Lilly
|
Sumner | Court of Appeals | |
Gavin vs. Gavin
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Scott | Court of Appeals | |
IN RE: Estate of Lillie Mae Porter - Concurring
This case involves an application in probate for the fees and expenses of attorneys Mary Katherine Longworth and Peggy J. S. Monger (“the Attorneys”) arising out of their representation of Thomas S. Harvey, the former executor of the Estate of Lillie Mae Porter (“the Estate”). Being dissatisfied with the probate court’s award, the Attorneys appealed. For the reasons stated herein, we vacate the judgment of the lower court and remand for further proceedings. |
Loudon | Court of Appeals |