COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Henry vs. Metro Gov't 01A01-9804-CV-00208	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/13/99
Collins vs. Willis 01A01-9808-CH-00433 Trial Court Judge: Jeffrey F. Stewart	Coffee	Court of Appeals	05/13/99
Grimes vs. Grimes 01A01-9809-CH-00483 Trial Court Judge: James L. Weatherford	Maury	Court of Appeals	05/13/99
Cobble vs. Shewmake et al 01A01-9803-CV-00169		Court of Appeals	05/13/99
The Realty Shop vs. RR Westminster Holding 01A01-9609-CH-00418		Court of Appeals	05/11/99
Robert Belch vs. Delisa Alsup 02A01-9806-CH-00165 Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/11/99
Charles Belk vs. Obion Co. 02A01-9807-CV-00189 Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree	Obion	Court of Appeals	05/11/99
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX Trial Court Judge: Floyd Peete, Jr.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/11/99
State vs. William Cox vs. A.C. Gilless 02A01-9806-CR-00154 Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/10/99
Gordon Peters vs. Sharon Peters 02A01-9810-CH-00283 Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/10/99
Annette Willis Clay v. Kerry Clay 02A01-9803-CV-00059 Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers Trial Court Judge: Judge D'Army Bailey Annette Clay (“Wife” or “Appellant”) appeals the judgment of the trial court which granted a divorce to Annette Clay and Kerry Clay (“Husband” or “Appellee”), awarded to Husband $17,270.00 of Wife’s total retirement benefit, awarded to Wife $212.00 of Husband’s $28,460.80 workers’ compensation settlement, and failed to award any amount of Husband’s workers’ compensation settlement as child support for the parties’ children.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/07/99
Quality First Staffing Services, v. Chase-Cavett Services, Inc., and Personnel Plus, Inc. 02A01-9807-CH-00205 Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers Trial Court Judge: Chancellor C. Neal Small James Richardson (“Richardson”) and James Taylor (“Taylor”), officers and agents 1It is not nec essary tha t the perso n who is c harged with conte mpt b e a party to the underlying proceeding. Tennessee Code Annotated §29-9-102(3) states that a court can inflict punishments for contempts of court for “the willful disobedience or resistance of an y officer of the said courts, party, juror, witness, or any other person to any lawful writ, pro cess, o rder, rule, de cree, or command of sa id courts .” (em phasis added). It is also not necessary that the proceedings out of which the contempt arose be complete. A judgment of contempt fixing punishment is a final judgment from w hich app eal will lie. Hall v . Hall, 772 S.W.2d 432, (Tenn.App. 1989 ); Rules App.Proc., Rule 3(a). 2 of Personnel Plus, Inc. (“Personnel”) appeal the ruling of the trial court holding them in contempt for failure to pay Sixty Seven Thousand Dollars ($67,000.00) owed by Personnel to Quality First Staffing Services (“Quality”) into the Registry of the Chancery Clerk.	Shelby	Court of Appeals	05/07/99
John C. Tomlinson v. Tennessee Department of Correction - Concurring 01A01-9804-CH-00204 Authoring Judge: Judge Patricia J. Cottrell Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr. In this appeal, a state prisoner appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his action in which he contends that he is entitled to the benefit of the 1989 Sentencing Reform Act’s allegedly lesser sentences for armed robbery, aggravated rape and aggravated kidnaping rather than the sentences imposed upon him at the time of his convictions in 1983. He also contends he is entitled, as a matter of law, to certain sentence reduction credits. Finally, he contends that, taken together, the downward adjustments of his sentence on the basis of these two contentions would entitle him to immediate release from custody. We affirm the dismissal of the prisoner's petition because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/05/99
George Weatherby Sickler, III v. Cletus Joy Sickler 01A01-9710-CV-00571 Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain Trial Court Judge: Judge Henry D. Bell This appeal involves the division of property and the award of alimony as between parties who were married for many years. On appeal, the appellant is challenging the trial court's characterization of certain property as marital property, the trial court's division of the marital estate, and the trial court's failure to award both periodic alimony as well as attorney fees and costs to the wife. The decision of the trial court is affirmed with regard to certain matters and reversed with regard to others.	Williamson	Court of Appeals	05/05/99
Louis Sullivan (King), v. Allison Grant King, Jr. 01A01-9803-CV-00116 Trial Court Judge: Judge Muriel Robinson This case involves a mother's post-divorce petition to modify custody. The trial court dismissed the petition and awarded attorney fees to the father's attorney. The mother asserts that circumstances have changed such that it is now in the children's best interests to live with her. We do not find that the mother has made the requisite showing of changed circumstances, and, accordingly, we affirm the decision of the trial court.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	05/05/99
Willie Perry, v. Robert Conley, et al. 02A01-9812-CV-00369 Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Highers Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph A. Walker Willie Perry ("Perry" or "Appellant") appeals the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to Appellees Robert Conley, et al. ("Appellees"). .		Court of Appeals	05/05/99
Marybeth Hogan v. George Lawson Yarbro 02A01-9905-CH-00119 Authoring Judge: Judge Holly Kirby Lillard Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Joe C. Morris This is a post-divorce action. The mother filed a petition to enforce the provisions of the marital dissolution agreement. The agreement provided for payment of attorney’s fees and costs for legal action to enforce the marital dissolution agreement. The trial court denied the mother’s request for attorney’s fees and costs. We reverse and remand.	Madison	Court of Appeals	05/01/99
Grover vs. Grover 01A01-9804-CH-00197 Trial Court Judge: Timothy L. Easter	Williamson	Court of Appeals	04/30/99
Scott vs. Scott 01A01-9806-CH-00272 Trial Court Judge: Don R. Ash	Rutherford	Court of Appeals	04/30/99
The Realty Shop vs. RR Westminster Holding 01A01-9609-CH-00418 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/30/99
01A01-9806-CH-00286 01A01-9806-CH-00286 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/30/99
Polyak vs. Hulen, et al 01A01-9803-CH-00133 Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton	Lawrence	Court of Appeals	04/30/99
Jones vs. Jones 01A01-9806-CV-00298 Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/29/99
Brandon vs. Brandon 01A01-9805-CV-00235 Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Corlew, III	Rutherford	Court of Appeals	04/29/99
David Tulis vs. Mike Greene M2000-02844-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford This is an appeal from the trial court's order dismissing a petition for review of a final agency decision of the Tennessee Department of Safety affirming the denial of petitioner's driver's license renewal. The chancery court affirmed the Order of the Department of Safety denying the application for renewal. Petitioner has appealed. We affirm.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	04/29/99