COURT OF APPEALS OPINIONS

02A01-9707-CH-00157
02A01-9707-CH-00157
Trial Court Judge: W. Michael Maloan

Obion Court of Appeals

Bradson Mercantile vs. Joseph Crabtree
02A01-9710-CV-00272

Shelby Court of Appeals

Connatser vs. Connatser
03A01-9801-CV-00005

Court of Appeals

King vs. King
03A01-9710-CH-00441

Court of Appeals

Kellogg Co., vs. TN Comm., et al
02A01-9612-CH-00302
Trial Court Judge: C. Neal Small

Shelby Court of Appeals

Fye vs. Kennedy
03A01-9707-CV-00287

Hamilton Court of Appeals

Sanjurjo vs. Woods
03A01-9708-CH-00330

Court of Appeals

Wilhoite vs. Proffitt
03A01-9801-CH-00004

Court of Appeals

Judd's vs. Muir
03A01-9801-CH-00002

Court of Appeals

03A01-9712-CV-00532
03A01-9712-CV-00532

Court of Appeals

Moore vs. Feathers
03A01-9802-CV-00063

Court of Appeals

City of Knox vs. Garuin
03A01-9801-CV-00038

Court of Appeals

Purkey vs. Purkey
03A01-9707-CV-00317

Court of Appeals

Canonie vs. Tennessee
03A01-9710-CH-00481

Court of Appeals

Hankins vs. Seaton
03A01-9710-CV-00468

Court of Appeals

Eblen vs. Johnson
03A01-9709-CH-00423

Court of Appeals

Atkins vs. Grooms
03A01-9708-JV-00337

Court of Appeals

Roach vs. Renfro
03A01-9711-CH-00517

Court of Appeals

3A01-9801-CH-00034
3A01-9801-CH-00034

Court of Appeals

3A01-9801-CV-00033
3A01-9801-CV-00033

Sevier Court of Appeals

Stone vs. Stone
M1997-00218-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Vernon Neal
This appeal involves a former spouse's efforts to extricate himself from the spousal support obligations contained in a marital dissolution agreement. Approximately one year after the entry of the divorce decree approving the agreement, the former husband requested the Chancery Court for Putnam County to set the agreement aside because he did not have independent legal advice and his judgment was impaired by antidepressant medication when he signed the agreement. The trial court modified portions of the decree but did not relieve the former husband of his spousal support obligation. Thereafter, the former husband filed a second motion seeking to terminate or reduce his spousal support obligations because of his former wife's improved financial circumstances. The trial court again declined to relieve the former husband of his obligation to pay spousal support. On this appeal, the former husband renews his argument that he should no longer be required pay spousal support because of his former wife's improved financial circumstance and his own weakened financial condition. We affirm the trial court's decision that the former husband has failed to prove the existence of a substantial, material change in circumstances that would warrant modifying his spousal support obligation.

Putnam Court of Appeals

Albert Gregurek v. Swope Motors
M2002-02854-COA-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: J. Curtis Smith
This case involves an interlocutory appeal from the trial court's denial of the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss on grounds of lack of personal jurisdiction and/or Motion for Summary Judgment. We reverse.

Marion Court of Appeals

Lyle vs. Michaelson Asset Management
01A01-9710-CV-00549
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

Davidson Court of Appeals

Kinney vs. Hale
01A01-9709-CV-00465
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Sr.

Warren Court of Appeals

Simmons, M.D. vs. Johnson
01A01-9709-CH-00495
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy

Davidson Court of Appeals