Roger L. Hickman v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting

Case Number
E2002-01916-CCA-R3-PC
I differ with the majority opinion in two major areas. First, the majority finds it unnecessary to reach the question of whether a judgment of conviction that is silent as to whether a defendant had counsel or waived his right to counsel is voidable or void. For reasons hereafter contained, I conclude such a judgment of conviction is facially invalid or void.
Authoring Judge
Judge John Everett Williams
Originating Judge
Judge Ray L. Jenkins
Case Name
Roger L. Hickman v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
HickmanD.pdf17.07 KB