Case Number
W2006-00543-CCA-R3-CD
I fully concur in the judgment of the Court that Appellant’s convictions and sentences should be affirmed. However, I disagree with the majority’s rationale concerning the striking by the trial court of Ms. Taylor’s testimony that she had never seen her husband intoxicated.
Originating Judge
Paula L. Skahan
Case Name
State of Tennessee v. Davidson M. Taylor - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
TaylorDavidsonMCON.pdf38.76 KB