State of Tennessee v. Donnie Marquis Tharpe
The Defendant, Donnie Marquis Tharpe, appeals from the Knox County Criminal Court’s |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jeffrey George Tulley
Jeffrey George Tulley, Defendant, pleaded guilty to three counts of sale of 0.5 grams or more of methamphetamine, three counts of delivery of 0.5 grams or more of methamphetamine, and four counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony. At sentencing, the trial court imposed three concurrent sentences of eleven years on the drug counts and a consecutive four-year sentence for the firearm counts, as a Range I offender, in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, Defendant argues that the trial court imposed an excessive sentence. Following our review of the entire record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Henderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Darrin Walker
Defendant, Darrin Walker, was indicted by a Shelby County Grand Jury for two counts of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Eula Beasley
The Defendant-Appellant, Eula Beasley, entered a guilty plea in the Davidson County Criminal Court to aggravated robbery (count one) and possession of a firearm with a prior conviction for a crime of violence (count two), for which he received an eight-year sentence for each count with the manner of service to be determined by the trial court. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered these sentences to be served consecutively, for an effective sentence of sixteen years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred in imposing consecutive sentences. Upon our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. William David Phillips
A Jefferson County jury convicted the defendant, William David Phillips, of four counts |
Jefferson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Luther Ray Mabe, Jr.
The defendant, Luther Ray Mabe, Jr., appeals his Hawkins County Criminal Court jury |
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Luther Ray Mabe, Jr.
I fully concur with my respected colleagues’ reasoning and judgment as it relates to |
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Danny Lynn Collier
The Defendant, Danny Lynn Collier, appeals the Sullivan County Criminal Court’s |
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Shanynthia Gardner
Following a bench trial, Shanynthia Gardner (“Defendant”) was convicted of four counts |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jamauri Ransom v. State of Tennessee
A Madison County jury convicted the Petitioner, Jamauri Ransom, of aggravated robbery |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Roosevelt Morris v. Jason Clendenion, Warden
Petitioner, Roosevelt Morris, appeals from the Hickman County Circuit Court’s summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Petitioner alleges he is entitled to relief because his sentence is unconstitutional under Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004), he did not receive timely pretrial notice of the State’s notice of intent to seek enhanced punishment, and because the habeas corpus court did not give him sufficient time to file a written reply to the State’s response to the habeas corpus petition. After review, we affirm the judgment of the habeas corpus court. |
Hickman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Donald Wayne Haynes
The Defendant, Donald Haynes, pleaded guilty to two counts of attempted aggravated sexual battery in exchange for an effective sentence of eight years to be served on probation. At a subsequent restitution hearing, the trial court ordered the Defendant to pay $42,000 in restitution to the victim in monthly installments of $500. On appeal, the Defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence of pecuniary loss to support an order of restitution. After review, we reverse and remand the case for the trial court to determine the victim’s credibility, the victim’s pecuniary loss, if any, and to make adequate findings of fact, if any, to support the imposition of restitution based upon sufficient credible evidence of pecuniary loss. |
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. William Timothy Kirk
Defendant, William Timothy Kirk, pleaded guilty to driving under the influence (DUI), first offense. The trial court sentenced Defendant to a term of eleven months, twenty-nine days in confinement, to be served at seventy-five percent. The trial court ordered the DUI sentence to be served consecutively to the life sentence for which Defendant was on parole at the time of the offense. On appeal, Defendant argues the trial court abused its discretion by imposing consecutive sentences. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Darren Marion Little
The Defendant, Darren Marion Little, pleaded guilty to two counts of violating the Sex Offender Registry and one count of possessing a prohibited weapon. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range III offender to an effective sentence of ten years of incarceration. On appeal, the Defendant contends, and the State concedes, that the trial court erred when it classified him as a Range III offender. After review, we agree with the parties. We reverse the trial court’s judgment and remand the case for resentencing. |
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Theodore Devon Wells
A Lincoln County jury convicted the Defendant, Theodore Devon Wells, of sale of a Schedule II narcotic, cocaine, and delivery of a Schedule II narcotic, cocaine. The trial court sentenced the Defendant as a Range III offender to twenty-eight years. On appeal, the Defendant contends that the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions and that the trial court erroneously admitted certain items of evidence. He further contends that his Sixth Amendment right of confrontation was violated. Finally, he contends that the trial court erred when it sentenced him. After review, we affirm the trial court’s judgments. |
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Chris M. Jones
Pro-se petitioner, Chris M. Jones, appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s denial of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Thakelyn J. Tate
The Defendant, Thakelyn J. Tate, was convicted by a jury of conspiracy to possess more |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Durrell James a/k/a James Durrell
Defendant, Durrell James a/k/a/ James Durrell, was convicted by a Shelby County Jury of |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jermaine R. Carpenter
The Defendant, Jermaine R. Carpenter, appeals the trial court’s summary dismissal of his |
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Edgar Bailey, Jr. v. State of Tennessee
The Petitioner, Edgar Bailey Jr., appeals from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James William Mabe v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, James William Mabe, appeals the denial of his post-conviction petition, arguing that the post-conviction court erred in denying his petition alleging ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Following our review of the entire record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Warren | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Cededrick Ivory a/k/a Cederick Ivory
The Defendant-Appellant, Cededrick Ivory, was indicted by a Shelby County Grand Jury |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Iesha Jones
The Defendant, Iesha Jones, was convicted by a Hamilton County Criminal Court jury of |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
In Re Kathy Delores Horton (Prospectively d/b/a A-Team Bail Bond Company, LLC)
The appellant, Kathy Delores Horton (prospectively D/B/A A-Team Bail Bond Company, LLC), appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s denial of her petition to operate a new bail bond company. The appellant asserts that the trial court erred in denying her petition because she had the requisite two years of experience working as a qualified agent. The appellant also raises a challenge regarding the en banc panel, the denial of a claim concerning ex parte communications, and an equal protection claim. Following our review, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s petition, as well as her other claims. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Robert Wayne Garner v. Grady Perry, Warden
Petitioner, Robert Wayne Garner, appeals from the Wayne County Circuit Court’s summary denial of his second petition for habeas corpus relief, in which he challenged the sufficiency of the felony murder indictment under which he was convicted. Petitioner argues on appeal that the habeas corpus court erred in failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law in denying relief. After review, we affirm the judgment of the habeas corpus court. |
Wayne | Court of Criminal Appeals |