State of Tennessee v. Darius Henderson
In this appeal from a resentencing hearing, the Defendant, Darius Henderson, challenges |
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Michael Bailey v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Michael Bailey, appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s summary |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Martiness Henderson v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, Martiness Henderson, appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s order denying his petition for post-conviction relief, in which he alleged that he received the ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. Having reviewed the entire record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Daryl Deangelo Rollins
Defendant, Daryl Deangelo Rollins, pled guilty to one count of reckless vehicular homicide |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Courtney R. Logan v. Vincent Vantell, Warden
The Petitioner, Courtney R. Logan, appeals the Hardeman County Circuit Court’s |
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Erik Courtney Lehto, Alias
A Knox County jury convicted the defendant, Erik Courtney Lehto, of two counts of rape |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Fedtrust Federal Credit Union v. Lynnsay Brooks
This appeal concerns a circuit court's disrnissal of an appeal by a Defendant from |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jessica R. Adkins v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Jessica R. Adkins, appeals the denial of her post-conviction petition, |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
Roger Reed v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Roger Reed, appeals the Shelby County Criminal Court’s denial of postconviction |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Frank Delmar Raines, Jr.
Frank Delmar Raines, Jr., Defendant, was indicted for rape, aggravated kidnapping, and |
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Tondre Durpress Ragland
A Haywood County jury convicted the defendant, Tondre Durpress Ragland, of attempted second-degree murder, possession of a firearm during the commission of a dangerous felony, and aggravated assault, for which he received an effective sentence of twenty years in confinement. On appeal, the defendant contends the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for aggravated assault. The defendant also argues the trial court erred in imposing partial consecutive sentences. Following our review, we affirm the defendant’s convictions. However, we reverse the imposition of consecutive sentences and remand to the trial court for a new sentencing hearing for consideration of the consecutive sentencing factors outlined in State v. Wilkerson, 905 S.W.2d 933 (Tenn. 1995). |
Haywood | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Daryl Bobo
The defendant appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s denial of his motion seeking resentencing pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-432(h). Upon our review of the applicable law and the briefs of the parties, we conclude the defendant does not have an appeal as of right and the instant appeal should be dismissed. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Jonathan Michael Atha v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Jonathan Michael Atha, appeals the denial of his motion for a hearing on |
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Cody Lynn Wyrick, Alias
The defendant, Cody Lynn Wyrick, Alias, appeals his Knox County Criminal Court jury |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Demorris Sanchez McKenzie v. State of Tennessee
Petitioner, DeMorris Sanchez McKenzie, sought relief from his convictions and effective |
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Andre JuJuan Lee Green
The State appeals the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence recovered during the search of the car in which the defendant was a passenger. The State asserts that the trial court erred because the scent of marijuana provided probable cause for the search regardless of the possibility that legal hemp was the source of the odor. After review, we conclude the trial court erred in granting the defendant’s motion to suppress. Therefore, we reverse the trial court’s order granting the defendant’s motion for suppression, reinstate the indictments against the defendant, and remand to the trial court for further proceedings. |
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. DeAnthony D. Hart
The Defendant, DeAnthony D. Hart, challenges the legal sufficiency of the evidence |
Henderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Adarion C. Morris v. State of Tennessee
In April 2018, Petitioner, Adarion C. Morris, pleaded guilty in three separate cases and received an effective sentence of six years to be served on community corrections. However, after two community corrections violation warrants were filed, one in June 2018 and another in August 2018, the trial court held a hearing, revoked Petitioner’s community corrections sentence, and re-sentenced Petitioner to forty-eight years in the Department of Correction. This court affirmed the trial court’s revocation and sentence imposed on appeal. See State v. Adarion C. Morris, No. M2018-02034-CCA-R3-CD (Tenn. Crim. App. Dec. 5, 2019), no perm. app. filed. Petitioner subsequently filed a post-conviction petition alleging that he received ineffective assistance of counsel when entering his guilty pleas, which rendered his pleas unknowing and involuntary. He also alleged counsel was ineffective at the revocation hearing and re-sentencing for not challenging the legality of the original community corrections sentence. After a hearing, the post-conviction court concluded Petitioner’s ineffective assistance of counsel claims regarding the guilty pleas were untimely and that the ineffective assistance of counsel claim relative to the revocation and re-sentencing was without merit. Petitioner appeals, arguing that he is entitled to due process tolling of the limitations period for his claims regarding his guilty pleas. After review, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Douglas Wayne Woods
The Defendant, Douglas Wayne Woods, was convicted by a Sullivan County Criminal |
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jerry Rommell Gray
After a jury trial, the Defendant, Jerry Rommell Gray, was convicted of felony murder, |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State of Tennessee v. Russell Davis
The Defendant, Russell Davis, appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court’s summary |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Billy W. Locke
Defendant, Billy W. Locke, appeals from the trial court’s summary dismissal of his two |
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Jasmin Lawan Towles
The Defendant, Jasmin Lawan Towles, was convicted by a Fayette County Circuit Court |
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Marcus Johnson v. Kevin Genovese, Warden
Marcus Johnson, Petitioner, sought habeas corpus relief for the third time after his convictions for one count of felony murder, one count of especially aggravated robbery, and one count of aggravated assault. See State v. Marcus Johnson, No. W2002-00987-CCA-R3-CD, 2003 WL 22080778, at *14 (Tenn. Crim. App. Sept. 4, 2003), perm. app. denied (Tenn. Jan. 26, 2004); Marcus Johnson v. State, No. W2007-02664-CCA-R3-PC, 2008 WL 4866817, at *2 (Tenn. Crim. App. Nov. 10, 2008), no perm. app. filed. The petition was dismissed without a hearing after the habeas corpus court determined that Petitioner was merely raising issues that had previously been litigated. We determine that the habeas corpus court properly dismissed the petition and affirm the judgment of that court. |
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. William Rimmel, III
Defendant, William Rimmel, III, was indicted by the Marion County Grand Jury for one count of aggravated assault, two counts of reckless endangerment, one count of false imprisonment, one count of vandalism over $2,500, and one count of burglary of an automobile. The charge of false imprisonment was dismissed prior to trial. A jury found Defendant guilty of attempted aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, attempted reckless endangerment, vandalism under $1,000, and attempted burglary of an automobile. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court denied Defendant’s request for judicial diversion and imposed an effective sentence of two years on probation following service of 11 months and 29 days in confinement. On appeal, Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions, that the trial court abused its discretion in denying Defendant’s request for an alternative sentence and in ordering consecutive sentencing, that his convictions should be vacated due to the State’s failure to preserve evidence, and that the trial court gave confusing jury instructions. Based on the record, the briefs, and oral arguments, we affirm the judgments of the trial court but remand for entry of a judgment in Count 4 and amended judgment in Count 3, reflecting that those counts were dismissed, and for entry of corrected judgments in Counts 5 and 6. |
Marion | Court of Criminal Appeals |