State vs. John Brown W1999-00626-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey
John Brown appeals from his Shelby County convictions of aggravated robbery and especially aggravated kidnapping. He alleges insufficiency of identification evidence and plain error in admission of evidence of arrests for other crimes. Because there is no error of record requiring reversal, we affirm.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Carl Ross W1999-01455-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Joe Brown
The petitioner, Carl Ross, appeals from the Shelby County Criminal Court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief in which he asserted various instances of ineffective assistance of counsel. Because we conclude that the record supports the lower court's determination that the petitioner failed to establish his claims by clear and convincing evidence, we affirm the dismissal of the post-conviction petition.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. John Vengrin W1999-01512-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Robert A. Page
The defendant, John Joseph Vengrin, appeals the maximum, 25-year sentence imposed upon him for the crime of second degree murder. He alleges that the trial court erroneously relied on testimony given in another matter in considering whether certain enhancement factors applied. We agree that the trial court erred in relying on matters outside the record; however, we hold that the defendant waived any objection by advocating that the court consider matters outside the record in assessing mitigating factors. Moreover, we hold that the sentence imposed was a proper one. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Madison
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Prince Glass W2000-00079-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III
The defendant, Prince Terrell Glass, appeals from his conviction of possession with intent to deliver .5 grams or more of cocaine. He alleges the evidence of "intent to deliver" is insufficient to support his conviction and that he is guilty of no offense greater than simple possession. Upon review of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, we affirm.
Lauderdale
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Lisa Ann Bargo E1999-00156-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Phyllis H. Miller
Defendant Lisa Ann Bargo was convicted by a jury of one count of forgery, one count of attempt to commit theft over $10,000, and one count of criminal impersonation. The trial court subsequently set aside the jury verdicts on the attempt to commit theft and the criminal impersonation charges and sentenced the defendant on her forgery conviction to ten years as a Range II multiple offender to be served in the Department of Correction. In this appeal, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence and the length of the sentence. We affirm the defendant's conviction and sentence.
Sullivan
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Nassel Brown W1999-01558-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.
The petitioner, convicted of one count of rape of a child and sentenced to fifteen years, appeals from the trial court's order dismissing his petition for post-conviction relief. He argues that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing, inter alia, to investigate his case and for failing to interview and subpoena certain witnesses. We conclude that the petitioner has not demonstrated that the trial court erred. Therefore, we affirm the order dismissing his petition.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Benjamin Brown W1999-00327-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett
Benjamin Brown appeals from his convictions of one count of felony murder committed in the perpetration of aggravated child abuse and one count of aggravated child abuse. An effective sentence of life imprisonment was imposed. On direct appeal, he contends (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions; (2) the lesser offense of criminally negligent homicide should have been instructed; (3) testimony regarding prior bad acts was erroneously admitted; and (4) his convictions violate the constitutional protections against double jeopardy. Following review, the appellant's conviction for aggravated child abuse is vacated and dismissed as violative of the protections against double jeopardy. We affirm the appellant's conviction for felony murder finding the evidence sufficient to support his conviction. Because the appellant's motion for new trial as to felony murder was untimely filed, the remaining issues related to this conviction are waived.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Benjamin Brown W1999-00327-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett
Benjamin Brown appeals from his convictions of one count of felony murder committed in the perpetration of aggravated child abuse and one count of aggravated child abuse. An effective sentence of life imprisonment was imposed. On direct appeal, he contends (1) the evidence is insufficient to support his convictions; (2) the lesser offense of criminally negligent homicide should have been instructed; (3) testimony regarding prior bad acts was erroneously admitted; and (4) his convictions violate the constitutional protections against double jeopardy. Following review, the appellant's conviction for aggravated child abuse is vacated and dismissed as violative of the protections against double jeopardy. We affirm the appellant's conviction for felony murder finding the evidence sufficient to support his conviction. Because the appellant's motion for new trial as to felony murder was untimely filed, the remaining issues related to this conviction are waived.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Lon Pierce W1999-01433-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley
The defendant, Lon Adelbert Pierce, appeals from his conviction of the first degree premeditated murder of Larry Gene Peppers, Sr. He raises numerous issues on appeal. Significant among his appellate issues are his challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence based upon his claim of diminished capacity, his claim that a psychologist is incompetent to give rebuttal testimony on the issue of diminished capacity, and his claim that double jeopardy barred his retrial on first degree murder after the jury at his first trial determined that he was not guilty of the offense, as evidenced by juror affidavits. Because we find no error requiring reversal, we affirm the defendant's conviction.
Benton
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Brian Sullivan W1999-00941-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft
The appellant, Brian Sullivan, entered a plea of nolo contendere in the Shelby County Criminal Court to one count of attempted aggravated sexual battery, a Class C felony. The trial court sentenced the appellant to a term of three (3) years, suspended. On appeal, the appellant argues that the trial court erred in denying his petition for judicial diversion. After a review of the record before this Court, we conclude that because the appellant was convicted of a sexual offense, he is statutorily ineligible for judicial diversion. Therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
State vs. James Carter W1999-00799-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Bernie Weinman
A Shelby County jury convicted the Defendant of first degree murder, and the trial court sentenced him to life imprisonment. The Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the conviction, and the Tennessee Supreme Court denied permission to appeal. The Defendant filed a petition for post-conviction relief, which the trial court denied after an evidentiary hearing. The Defendant appeals the denial of post-conviction relief and raises the following two issues: (1) whether the jury instruction on circumstantial evidence was proper; and (2) whether he received effective assistance of counsel at his trial. Finding no error, we affirm.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Jarvis Loverson W1999-01750-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey
A Shelby County jury convicted the appellant, Jarvis Loverson, of one (1) count of theft of property over $1,000, a Class D felony, and one (1) count of attempted theft of property over $10,000, a Class D felony. The trial court sentenced the appellant as a Range II offender to consecutive terms of twelve (12) years for each offense. On appeal, the appellant contends that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions for theft of property and attempted theft of property. After thoroughly reviewing the record before this Court, we conclude that the state failed to present any evidence regarding the value of the subject property. As a result, the appellant's conviction for theft of property over $1,000 is modified to theft of property valued at $500 or less, and his conviction for attempted theft of property over $10,000 is modified to attempted theft of property with a value of $500 or less.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Michael Spadafina W1999-00268-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn
The Benton County Circuit Court dismissed Michael Joseph Spadafina's petition for post-conviction relief in which Spadafina raised a number of issues of trial error and ineffective assistance of trial counsel in his conviction of first degree murder. On appeal, the petitioner limited his issues to the ineffective assistance of counsel in not seeking an individual, sequestered voir dire of the jury and in not challenging the use of damaging character evidence. Because we conclude that the petitioner failed to carry his post-conviction burden to prove his claims by clear and convincing evidence, we affirm the dismissal of the post-conviction petition.
State vs. Jerry Michael Green E1999-01815-CCA-R9-RL
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Carroll L. Ross
The appellant, Jerry Michael Green, proceeded to trial in the Monroe County Criminal Court for possession of more than .5 grams of cocaine with intent to deliver. Due to the State's improper cross-examination of defense witnesses, the trial court granted the appellant a mistrial. The appellant made a motion in limine to preclude the State, on double jeopardy grounds, from retrying the appellant on possession of cocaine with intent to deliver. The trial court denied the appellant's motion, but granted the appellant permission to appeal its decision. This court granted an interlocutory appeal. In this interlocutory appeal, the appellant claims that double jeopardy bars a retrial because the prosecutor goaded the appellant into requesting a mistrial. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Monroe
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Clint T. Melton E1999-02090-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins
Knox
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Nicholas Williams M1999-00780-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Jim T. Hamilton
In 1998, the Giles County Grand Jury indicted the Defendant for one count of statutory rape and ten counts of sexual battery. In 1999, a Giles County jury tried the Defendant and found him guilty of one count of statutory rape and five counts of sexual battery. Following a hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant to two years incarceration for each conviction and ordered that five of the six sentences be served consecutively, resulting in an effective sentence of ten years. The Defendant now appeals as of right, arguing (1) that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his convictions for sexual battery; (2) that the trial court erred by consolidating all counts for trial; and (3) that he was improperly sentenced. We conclude that the evidence is insufficient as to one count of sexual battery and thus reverse one of the Defendant's convictions for sexual battery. In addition, we conclude that the trial court erred by consolidating all counts for trial, but conclude that this error was harmless. Finally, following our reversal of the sexual battery conviction in case 8652, count one, with a two-year sentence, and a de novo review of the remaining sentences imposed by the trial court, we conclude that an effective sentence of eight years in the Tennessee Department of Corrections is appropriate.
Giles
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. John Charles Johnson M2000-00529-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.
Defendant John Charles Johnson was convicted by a Davidson County jury of second degree murder, facilitation of aggravated kidnapping, and especially aggravated robbery. The trial court sentenced Defendant to twenty-five years for second degree murder, five years for facilitation of aggravated kidnapping, and twenty years for especially aggravated robbery. The trial court further ordered that Defendant's sentences for second degree murder and facilitation of aggravated kidnapping be served consecutive to each other and concurrent with Defendant's sentence for especially aggravated robbery, resulting in an effective sentence of thirty years. Defendant raises the following issues in this appeal: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his three convictions; (2) whether the trial court erred in not granting Defendant's motion for judgment of acquittal on the ground that the testimony of a co-defendant was uncorroborated; (3) whether the trial court erred in not allowing Defendant to play a tape containing exculpatory statements; (4) whether the trial court erred by failing to charge the lesser-included offenses of voluntary manslaughter and facilitation to commit voluntary manslaughter; and (5) whether the length of the sentences imposed by the trial court were proper. Following a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court concerning Defendant's convictions and the lengths of Defendant's sentences. We reverse the trial court's order of consecutive sentencing and remand for a new hearing solely on the issue of concurrent or consecutive sentencing.
Davidson
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Amelia Kay Stem M2000-00600-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Stella L. Hargrove
The appellant, Amelia Kay Stem, entered a plea of nolo contendere in the Lawrence County Circuit Court to one count of second degree murder. The trial court sentenced the appellant to twenty-five years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The appellant raises the following issue(s) for our review: whether the trial court erred in sentencing the appellant by incorrectly applying enhancement factors, by failing to apply mitigating factors, and by neglecting to make specific findings of fact on the record. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Lawrence
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Gregory Lynn Redden M2000-00761-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris
The appellant, Gregory Lynn Redden, pled guilty in the Williamson County Circuit Court to one count of burglary, a class D felony. The trial court sentenced the appellant as a Range III persistent offender to eleven years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The trial court further ordered the appellant to serve this sentence consecutively to the appellant's unserved sentences imposed in Greene County, Missouri, in the United States District Court in the Northern District of Ohio, and in Robertson County, Tennessee. The appellant raises the following issue for our review: whether the trial court erred in ordering the appellant to serve his sentence in this case consecutively to his other sentences. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Williamson
Court of Criminal Appeals
Joseph Whitwell vs. State M1999-02493-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Cheryl A. Blackburn
Petitioner, Joseph Whitwell, filed a Petition for Post-Conviction Relief in the Davidson County Criminal Court, which the post-conviction court subsequently denied. Petitioner challenges the denial of his petition, raising the following issue: whether the trial court erred in dismissing his Petition for Post-Conviction Relief, based upon a ruling that Petitioner's allegations of ineffective assistance of counsel were without merit. After a thorough review of the record, we find that the Petitioner did not receive the ineffective assistance of counsel. We therefore affirm the trial court's denial of the Petitioner's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief.
Davidson
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Charles Swaffer M2000-00058-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: J. O. Bond
Defendant Charles E. Swaffer was convicted by a Macon County jury of one count of Class C theft of property over $10,000 and one count of Class D vandalism over $1,000. The trial court subsequently imposed concurrent sentences of five years and three years, with Defendant to serve one year of incarceration followed by supervised probation. Defendant challenges his convictions, raising the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred when it failed to grant a motion for a mistrial; (2) whether the evidence was sufficient to support his convictions; and (3) whether the trial court erred in applying improper enhancing factors and rejecting his mitigating factors. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
State vs. Richard M. Far, Jr. M1999-01998-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: James K. Clayton, Jr.
Defendant, Richard M. Far, Jr., was convicted by a Rutherford County jury of Class D forgery of a document valued at more than $1,000. Subsequently, the trial court sentenced Defendant as a Range III persistent offender to ten (10) years to be served consecutively to Defendant's sentence in an arson case (F-45893). Defendant raises two issues on appeal: 1) whether the trial court erred in excluding Defendant from his trial and sentencing hearing and 2) whether the trial court properly considered the sentencing guidelines in sentencing Defendant. After a review of the record, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand this matter for a new trial.
