State vs. Cedric Dickerson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Timothy Wayne Reece
|
Carter | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Marty Thatcher
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robert Gillespie
|
Rhea | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Leonard Prater
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Leonard Prater
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Paul Dejongh
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
William Terry Wyatt
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Torayo Brown
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
James Judd vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02S01-9804-CH-00041
|
Obion | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. CarlosHayes
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9709-CC-00434
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Graves
|
Jefferson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Zip Gillespie
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. David Keen
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jackie Ozier
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Delores Smith & David Robinson
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Ricky Brown vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeff Warfield
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jeffery Holder
|
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9804-CC-00145
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Keffer
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Mark Crites
Mark Crites appeals from the revocation of his community corrections sentence. He challenges both the propriety of that revocation and his resentencing, arguing that: (1) the trial court abused its discretion in revoking his community corrections sentence; (2) the trial court misapplied certain enhancement factors and that his sentences are, therefore, excessive; and (3) the trial court erred in ordering consecutive sentencing. After careful review of the record and arguments of counsel, we conclude the trial court relied upon improper evidence in revoking the community corrections sentence. We remand for another revocation hearing. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Roy D. Nelson, Jr.
The defendant, Roy D. Nelson, stands convicted of burglary, aggravated burglary, aggravated arson and possession of marijuana as a result of his efforts to blow up his ex-wife's home. Nelson received his convictions at the conclusion of a jury trial in the Washington County Criminal Court. A Range III offender, Nelson is presently serving an effective 62-year sentence in the Department of Correction for his crimes.1 In this direct appeal, Nelson claims he was improperly convicted of aggravated arson because he, rather than another person, suffered the serious bodily injury relied upon to elevate the offense from arson to aggravated arson. Having reviewed the appellate record, the arguments of the parties and the applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Washington | Court of Criminal Appeals |