01C01-9707-CC-00256
|
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9707-CC-00256
|
Dickson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Under The Facts.&Quot; State v. William Hightower, C.C.A. No. 01C01-9507-Cc-00234,
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9701-CC-00040
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Philip Cantwell
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Philip Cantwell
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Paul E. Mathis
|
Franklin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Taylor
|
Marshall | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Paul Smith vs. State
|
Lawrence | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Thomas Light vs. State
|
Lawrence | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Sandy Cobb
|
Williamson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Barton Hawkins
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9802-CC-00052Cecil
|
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gabriel Clark
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Robert Goss/Carl Hale
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Walter Johnson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Holmes
|
Chester | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Paschal Hyde
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Terry Dean Sneed
The Defendant, Terry Dean Sneed, appeals as of right from a Unicoi County jury verdict convicting him of aggravated robbery, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated rape, and two counts of aiding and abetting aggravated rape.1 The trial court sentenced him to a total of one hundred and twenty-four ye ars; while the sentences for the rape convictions qualify as Range II, multiple offender, the other sentences are Range III, persistent offender. The Defendant appeals his |
Unicoi | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Cedrick Stampley
The appellant, Cedric Stampley, appeals as of right the denial in the Shelby County Criminal Court of his petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court dismissed appellant’s pro se petition without the appointment of counsel and without an evidentiary hearing. On appeal, appellant argues that the trial court erred in summarily dismissing his petition. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Jacob Meeks
The defendant appeals from the dismissal of a petition for post-conviction relief, wherein he sought a delayed appeal from the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals, which affirmed his trial court conviction for “hindering a secured creditor,” to the Supreme Court. |
Fayette | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. James Christopher Tatrow
A jury in Cumberland County Criminal Court convicted the defendant, James Christopher Tatrow, of two counts of felony murder and two counts of especially aggravated kidnapping in the deaths of Roger Zammit and John Harry. The defendant was also convicted of two counts of premeditated and deliberate murder of the same victims. The trial court set aside those verdicts, however, as the thirteenth juror. See Tenn. R. Crim. P. 33 (f). In the sentencing phase, the jury declined to impose the death penalty or life without parole and sentenced the defendant to serve life sentences with the possibility of parole. At the conclusion of a sentencing hearing, the trial court ordered the defendant to serve two consecutive life sentences concurrently with sentences of 22 years for the kidnapping convictions. The defendant now challenges the validity of the convictions and the propriety of consecutive sentencing pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. |
Cumberland | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Royce Lane
|
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Love
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Madison Blackman, Jr.
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals |