COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOMO KENYATTA BERRY
E2024-01902-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Hector Sanchez

A Knox County jury convicted the defendant, Jomo Kenyatta Berry, of one count of
attempted first-degree murder, two counts of employing a firearm during the commission
of a dangerous felony, two counts of unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon,
one count of aggravated stalking, two counts of vandalism, three counts of reckless
endangerment, one count of theft, one count of burglary of a vehicle, one count of
attempted second-degree murder, and one count of aggravated assault, for which he
received an effective sentence of forty-one years in confinement. On appeal, the defendant
contends the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction for
aggravated assault. The defendant also argues the trial court erred in denying his motion
to sever, the trial court failed to give complete and accurate jury instructions, and improper
argument by the State affected the verdict. After reviewing the record and considering the
applicable law, we remand the case to the trial court for entry of corrected judgment forms
in counts five, eight, eleven, and fourteen. In all other respects, we affirm the judgments
of the trial court.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TODD LEE WHITE
E2025-00151-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword

A Knox County grand jury convicted the defendant, Todd Lee White, of unlawful
possession of a weapon by a convicted felon and resisting arrest, for which he received an
effective sentence of twenty-four years. On appeal, the defendant argues the trial court
erred in denying his motion to suppress and in sentencing him as a Range III persistent
offender. After reviewing the record, hearing oral argument, and considering the
applicable law, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. LAMAR DENSON
E2025-00104-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. Senior Judge

The defendant, Lamar Lanair Denson, was convicted by a Knox County Criminal Court
jury of the sale of fentanyl, a Class C felony; possession of heroin with intent to sell or
deliver, a Class B felony; possession of fentanyl with intent to sell or deliver, a Class C
felony; possession of a firearm by one with a prior conviction for a felony drug offense, a
Class C felony; maintaining a dwelling for the unlawful selling of controlled substances, a
Class D felony; and possession of drug paraphernalia, a Class A misdemeanor. The trial
court imposed an effective sentence of fourteen years’ incarceration followed by five years
on supervised probation. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court abused its
discretion in: (1) denying his motion to dismiss Count 5 of the indictment, a charge related
to the sale of fentanyl, due to the loss of potentially exculpatory evidence; and (2) reopening
the proof to allow the State to enter into evidence a stipulation regarding the defendant’s
status as having a prior conviction that would disqualify him from possessing a firearm .
Following a thorough review of the record, the briefs, and oral arguments of the parties,
we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

DEWAINE LOVE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
E2025-00500-CCA-R3-HC
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword

The pro se petitioner, Dewaine Love, appeals the summary dismissal of his petition for
writ of habeas corpus, asserting that he is entitled to relief because his multiple convictions
violate due process and double jeopardy protections and that his sentence is unlawful
because it was imposed without the preparation of a presentence report. Upon our review
of the record and the parties’ briefs, we conclude that the petitioner’s notice of appeal was
untimely and that the interest of justice does not mandate waiver of the requirement. The
appeal is dismissed.

State of Tennessee v. Justin Lloyd
M2026-00298-CCA-R8-CO
Dispositive Order
Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter; Presiding Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer; Judge Jill Bartee Ayers
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jennifer Smith

This matter is before the Court upon motion of the Defendant, Justin Lloyd, for review of the trial court’s order granting the State’s motion to revoke his pretrial bond. See Tenn. R. App. P. 8; Tenn. Code. Ann. § 40-11-144. The State opposes. For the reasons stated below, the Defendant’s motion is denied.

State of Tennessee v. Demontrey Monquisze Logsdon
M2024-01471-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Trial Court Judge: Judge Khadija Lanice Babb

Defendant, Demontrey Monquisze Logsdon, was indicted by the Davidson County Grand Jury, along with two co-defendants, for two counts of first degree premeditated murder and first degree felony murder, along with several other charges. Defendant was convicted by a jury on all counts as charged, and Defendant was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. In this appeal as of right, Defendant asserts that he is entitled to plain error relief based on the admission of testimony by a detective who did not conduct the cell phone data extraction about which he testified. Defendant asserts he was denied his right to confront the witness who conducted the extraction. Because Defendant did not establish plain error, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Dale Maurice Teague
W2025-00268-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Trial Court Judge: Judge Bruce Irwin Griffey

The Carroll County Grand Jury indicted the Defendant, Dale Maurice Teague, with unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Count 1), possession of marijuana (Count 2), possession with the intent to use drug paraphernalia (Count 3), and possession of a prohibited weapon, to wit, knuckles (Count 4). After the trial court granted a motion for judgment of acquittal on the marijuana count, the jury convicted the Defendant of the remaining offenses, and the trial court imposed an effective eighteen-year sentence. On appeal, the Defendant argues: (1) the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions for the possession of a firearm by a convicted felon and possession of a prohibited weapon, knuckles; (2) the State violated two pretrial orders that resulted in the improper admission of hearsay and prior bad act evidence; and (3) the trial court erred in denying his initial motion to suppress and in denying his motion to reconsider the motion to suppress. After review, we affirm.

State of Tennessee v. George Harris Patterson, III
M2024-01608-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steve R. Dozier

Defendant, George Harris Patterson, III, who was described at oral argument as a First Amendment Auditor, was indicted for resisting arrest, disorderly conduct, and assault on a first responder after an incident at a Davidson County Post Office. A jury found Defendant not guilty of resisting arrest but guilty of disorderly conduct and assault. Defendant appeals, raising several issues. He challenges the sufficiency of the evidence, the constitutionality of the disorderly conduct statute under the First Amendment as applied to him, the trial court’s failure to give a special jury instruction, the trial court’s admission of a piece of evidence and testimony from a postal employee, and the trial court’s failure to grant a mistrial. He also insists he is entitled to cumulative error relief. After a review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Tommy Lynn Hollingsworth
W2025-00442-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald H. Allen

The defendant, Tommy Lynn Hollingsworth, appeals the order of the trial court revoking his probation and ordering him to serve the remainder of his six-year sentence in confinement. Upon our review of the record, the parties’ briefs, and oral arguments, we affirm the judgment of the trial court as to the denial of the defendant’s motion to dismiss and the revocation of the defendant’s probation. As to the disposition of the defendant’s probation, while we affirm the judgment of the trial court to order confinement in case number 96-195, the trial court erred in imposing that disposition in case number 96-193, which had expired.

State of Tennessee v. Tommy Lynn Hollingsworth - Dissent
W2025-00442-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald H. Allen

I respectfully dissent from the majority’s conclusion that the Defendant’s right to a speedy trial in probation revocation proceedings attached on December 26, 2024, which is when the July 8, 2002 violation of probation warrant was served and the Defendant was arrested. In Allen, the Tennessee Supreme Court held that “a probation revocation proceeding is a continuation of the criminal prosecution, and as such, the defendant . . . has a constitutional right to a speedy trial on ‘the offense of violation of the terms of probation.’” Allen v. State, 505 S.W.2d 715, 719 (Tenn. 1974). The Allen court then concluded that the “two year, eight month delay” between the issuance of the probation violation warrant and the revocation hearing violated the defendant’s right to a trial. Id. at 716-19.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. EARL DAVID MANEY
E2024-00649-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Camille R. McMullen
Trial Court Judge: Judge Sandra Donaghy

The Defendant was charged with first degree premeditated murder after shooting and
killing the victim during an argument. The Defendant was tried before a jury, and the trial
court instructed the jury on the defense of self-defense. The jury convicted the Defendant
of the lesser-included offense of voluntary manslaughter. The trial court sentenced the
Defendant to five years of incarceration, suspended after the service of eleven months,
twenty-nine days. In this direct appeal, the Defendant contends that the trial court erred in
allowing an eyewitness to offer opinion testimony, simultaneously infringing on the
Defendant’s constitutional right to not testify, and that the trial court erred in ordering the
Defendant to serve a portion of his sentence in confinement. We affirm the judgment of
the trial court.

KENNETH GEORGE ARNOLD v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
E2025-00368-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Barry A. Steelman
Trial Court Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery

The Petitioner, Kenneth George Arnold, appeals from the Hamilton County Criminal
Court’s denial of his petition for post-conviction relief from his convictions for rape,
aggravated sexual battery, and sexual battery by an authority figure, for which he is serving
an effective thirteen-year sentence. On appeal, he contends that the post-conviction court
erred in denying relief on his claims that he received the ineffective assistance of pretrial,
trial, and appellate counsel and that relief was required due to the cumulative effect of
multiple instances of deficient performance by his attorneys in the conviction proceedings.
We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court.

State of Tennessee v. Michael Sneed
W2025-00758-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Tony Childress

The Defendant, Michael Sneed, appeals from his guilty-pleaded convictions for two counts of the sale of methamphetamine in an amount over 0.5 gram, a Class B felony. See T.C.A. § 39-17-417(a), (c)(1) (Supp. 2022) (subsequently amended). The trial court ordered the Defendant to serve a sixteen-year sentence in confinement. On appeal, the Defendant, a Range II offender, contends the court erred by denying alternative sentencing. We affirm the judgments of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Pauline Virginia Spalding and Charles Martin Johnson
M2024-00044-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Jeffrey Usman
Trial Court Judge: Judge Mark J. Fishburn

Defendants Pauline Virginia Spalding and Charles Martin Johnson were jointly indicted for especially aggravated kidnapping, aggravated assault, and impersonating a police officer. The Defendants were tried together by a jury, and the jury convicted both Defendants as charged. The trial court sentenced Ms. Spalding to fifteen years for the kidnapping conviction, three years for the assault conviction, and eleven months, twenty-nine days for the impersonation conviction. The trial court ordered Ms. Spalding’s sentences to be served concurrently, for an effective term of incarceration of fifteen years. The trial court sentenced Mr. Johnson to seventeen years for the kidnapping conviction, four years for the assault conviction, and eleven months, twenty-nine days for the impersonation conviction. The trial court ordered Mr. Johnson’s sentences to be served concurrently, for an effective term of incarceration of seventeen years. In this consolidated direct appeal, Mr. Johnson challenges the sufficiency of the evidence underlying his especially aggravated kidnapping conviction and also contends that his dual convictions for especially aggravated kidnapping and aggravated assault violate double jeopardy. Ms. Spalding contends that the trial court erred in denying the admission of certain evidence; that purported dishonesty from one of the jurors during voir dire entitles her to a new trial; and that the trial court erred in sentencing her. We affirm.

State of Tennessee v. Justin Johnson a/k/a Straight Drop
W2025-00127-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Matthew J. Wilson
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jennifer Johnson Mitchell

Defendant, Justin Johnson-a/k/a Straight Drop, appeals his convictions for conspiracy to commit first degree murder, first degree premeditated murder, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, for which he received an effective sentence of life imprisonment plus thirty-five years. On appeal, Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, the admission of photographs of the victim’s body at the crime scene and during the autopsy, the trial court’s denial of his request to sit at counsel table during trial, and the prosecutor’s comments during closing arguments. Defendant also contends that he is entitled to relief due to the cumulative effect of multiple errors. Upon review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOHN BASSETT
E2024-01681-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Kyle A. Hixson
Trial Court Judge: Judge G. Scott Green

The Defendant, John Bassett, appeals from his conviction for first degree premeditated
murder, for which he received a life sentence without the possibility of parole. On appeal,
the Defendant contends that (1) the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction
because the State failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that he was responsible for the
victim’s death and that he acted with premeditation and (2) the evidence was insufficient
to support an enhanced sentence based upon the aggravating circumstance that the murder
was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel. After review, we affirm the judgment of the
trial court with respect to the Defendant’s conviction. However, we reverse the judgment
of the trial court with respect to the Defendant’s sentence and remand the case for the entry
of an amended judgment sentencing the Defendant to imprisonment for life.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. VIDAL CHAD BRYANT
E2025-00493-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Hector Sanchez

The defendant, Vidal Chad Bryant, pled guilty to attempted possession with the intent to
sell butyrylfentanyl, a Class C felony; possession with the intent to sell less than half a
gram of methamphetamine, a Class C felony; and possession of a firearm after having been
previously convicted of a felony drug offense, a Class C felony, for an agreed-upon
effective sentence of six years in the Tennessee Department of Correction (“TDOC”). On
appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion
to suspend the remainder of his sentence to probation. Following our review of the record,
the parties’ briefs, and applicable law, we affirm the trial court’s denial of the defendant’s
motion.

Cedric Peter Hopgood v. State of Tennessee
W2025-01001-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert H. Montgomery, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald H. Allen

The Defendant, Cedric Peter Hopgood, pleaded guilty to multiple felony drug possession offenses and received an agreed-upon sentence of thirty-three years. See T.C.A. § 39-17- 417 (2025). The Defendant filed a motion to withdraw his guilty pleas, which the trial court summarily denied. On appeal, the Defendant argues that the trial court erred by denying his motion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Raymond Antonio Smith
M2024-01108-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Forest A. Durard, Jr.

Defendant, Raymond Antonio Smith, appeals from his convictions for first degree premeditated murder and theft of property valued at $2,500 or more but less than $10,000, for which he is serving a sentence of life plus twelve years. On appeal, Defendant contends that the evidence was insufficient relative to premeditation and to the stolen property’s value. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm.

State of Tennessee v. John Valentine
W2025-01411-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert L. Holloway, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Carolyn W. Blackett

Movant, John Valentine, appeals the summary dismissal of his motion to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 36.1. On appeal, he argues that the indictment was defective and that his double jeopardy rights were violated. After our review, we affirm.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. TONY CHARLES DAVENPORT
E2025-00452-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword
Trial Court Judge: Judge Gary McKenzie

The Defendant, Tony Charles Davenport, was convicted by a Cumberland County jury of
reckless homicide, attempted second degree murder, and attempted voluntary
manslaughter, for which he received an effective sentence of twenty-five years’
incarceration to be served as a Range II, multiple offender. On appeal, the Defendant
claims that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions of attempted second
degree murder and attempted voluntary manslaughter and that the trial court erred in
imposing consecutive sentencing. The State responds that the Defendant’s appeal is
untimely and should be dismissed. Because we conclude that the Defendant’s notice of
appeal was untimely filed and that the interests of justice do not merit waiver of the
untimeliness, we dismiss the appeal.

JACOB EVAN COYNE v. STATE OF TENNESSEE
E2025-00589-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword
Trial Court Judge: Judge Amanda B. Dunn

The Petitioner, Jacob Evan Coyne, appeals from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s
denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. On appeal, the Petitioner maintains that he
received the ineffective assistance of counsel based upon trial counsel’s (1) failure to
investigate or file pretrial motions challenging the credibility of an officer who investigated
his case, (2) failure to sufficiently meet with or to advise the Petitioner regarding the nature
of his case, and (3) failure to adequately advise the Petitioner regarding the status of plea
negotiations. Discerning no error, we affirm.

Jonathan Hamilton v. State of Tennessee
W2026-00147-CCA-R10-PC
Dispositive Order
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Ross Dyer, Judge John W. Campbell, Judge Matthew J. Wilson
Trial Court Judge: Judge Lee V. Coffee

On February 4, 2026, the pro se Appellant filed an application for an extraordinary appeal pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 10. On February 6, 2026, this Court issued an order noting that the Appellant failed to comply with the procedural requirements of Rule 10 by failing to attach to his application any order issued by the trial court for which review may be available. See Tenn. R. App. P. 10(a), (c). However, the Appellant also requested relief pursuant to the writ of mandamus, asserting that the trial court had failed to comply with the procedural requirements of the Post-Conviction Procedure Act. This Court requested a response from the State regarding the current status of the trial court proceedings and the appropriateness of the writ of mandamus.

DARENA L. DORSEY v. SCOTT DORSEY
E2024-00742-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge John W. McClarty
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Michael E. Jenne

This case arises out of the demise of a 20-year marriage. The trial court declared the parties divorced, equitably divided the marital estate, and awarded the wife alimony in solido, transitional alimony, and alimony in futuro. The husband appeals. Finding no abuse of discretion, we affirm the trial court’s decision in all respects.

STATE OF TENNESSEE v. JOSHUA BOWMAN
E2025-00174-CCA-R3-ECN
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Steven W. Sword

In 2011, a Knox County jury convicted the Petitioner, Joshua Bowman, of multiple
offenses stemming from the robbery and killing of the victim. He appealed his convictions,
all of which were affirmed save one: his conviction for especially aggravated kidnapping,
which we remanded for a new trial based on a jury instruction error. State v. Bowman, No.
E2012-00923-CCA-R3-CD, 2013 WL 4680402, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. Aug. 29, 2013),
perm. app. denied (Tenn. Feb. 11, 2014). In 2022, the Petitioner filed a petition for a writ
of error coram nobis saying that there was newly discovered evidence in the form of his
mental and counseling records, which supported his “intellectually diminished capacity
argument.” The State did not file its response until 2025, and it asserted that the records
were not newly discovered because they were his own records and, therefore, known to
him. After a hearing, the coram nobis court dismissed the petition finding that the petition
was untimely and that the Petitioner was not entitled to tolling because he was aware of his
educational limitations before trial and had discussed those limitations with his trial
attorney. After review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.