State vs. Michael Stevenson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Michael Stevenson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kynan Redmond
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Thomas Johnson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9904-CC-00144
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9901-CR-00032
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Andre Lee
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Aimee Lynn Wolfe
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Ground For a Petition To Rehear. See Nashville v. State Board of Equalization, 210 Tenn. 587, 618,
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Janie Cousett
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Brandon Bills
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Wanda Bledsoe
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Also State v. Mixon, 983 S.W.2D 661, 668-71 (Tenn. 1999). As a Result, The Trial Court
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Moore
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
W1999-1977-CCA-R3-CD
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Frank Massengill
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John M. Johnson
|
Tipton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9906-CR-00227
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9905-CR-00200
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Wayne Leroy Evans
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Ronald Lockhart
Defendant Ronald Lockhart appeals as of right from his conviction by a Hamblen County jury of driving under the influence, third offense, and driving with a revoked license. Defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of driving under the influence. After a careful review of the record, we find no error, and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Mickey Jeffries
The defendant, Mickey Jeffries, was convicted of felony murder. The trial court imposed a life sentence. In this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Kenneth Weems vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Kenneth Weems, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. The single issue presented for review is whether the petitioner was denied the effective assistance of counsel for having failed to timely file an interlocutory appeal of an order denying the suppression of certain of the state's evidence. We find no error and affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Robert Emmet Dunlap, Jr.
The defendant, Robert Emmet Dunlap, Jr., was convicted on three counts of the sale of cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-17-417(a)(3). Fines totaled $225,000.00. The trial court imposed sentences of ten years on each count to be served concurrently with each other but consecutively to a prior sentence for a conviction in Montgomery County. |
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Franklin Dan Rickman
Petitioner was convicted of theft and felony escape, and brought a post-conviction proceeding challenging his convictions. The petition was denied by the trial court. We affirm the dismissal of the petition. |
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals |