COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

Daniel Benson Taylor vs. State
01C01-9904-CC-00132

State vs. Darren Matthews
02C01-9812-CR-00372
Trial Court Judge: Arthur T. Bennett

State vs. Robin Dehart
03C01-9807-CC-00234
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

Edward T. Kendricks vs. State
03C01-9806-CR-00205

State vs. Melvin Jerome Anderson
03C01-9808-CC-00293
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Jr.

State vs. Tracy Lebron Vick
03C01-9803-CR-00100
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

State vs. Tracy Lebron Vick
03C01-9803-CR-00100
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

State vs. Jerry Hayes
02C01-9810-CC-00338
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

State vs. David Hundley
02C01-9810-CC-00313
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree

State vs. David Hundley
W2001-00500-CCA-RM-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: William B. Acree
In this case, the petitioner, David Lee Hundley, filed a petition for post-conviction relief. The trial court dismissed the petition on the basis that it was barred by the applicable statute of limitations. Our Court reversed and remanded for a determination by the trial court as to whether there was sufficient evidence of Petitioner's prior mental health problems to warrant a tolling of the statute of limitations. David Lee Hundley v. State, No. 02C01-9810-CC-00313, 1999 WL 668723, Weakley County (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, August 26, 1999). The supreme court granted the State's application for permission to appeal pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 11 and remanded the case to this Court for reconsideration in light of State v. Nix, S.W.3d, No. E1999-02715-SC-R11-PC, slip op. (Tenn. Feb. 20, 2001). Upon remand, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State vs. Gerald Schaffer
03C01-9807-CR-00226
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

Michael Dickerson vs. State
03C01-9808-CC-00306
Trial Court Judge: Ben W. Hooper, II

State vs. James Otis Martin
03C01-9803-CR-00103
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

State vs. Bao Nguyon
02C01-9801-CR-00004
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft

State vs. Eric Carter
02C01-9809-CR-00299
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

Adrian Waite vs. State
03C01-9809-CR-00343
Trial Court Judge: Stephen M. Bevil

Gary William Holt vs. State
03C01-9808-CR-00279
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

Thomas Cook vs. State
03C01-9808-CR-00281

State vs. Guillermo Matian Juan
03C01-9812-CR-00443
Trial Court Judge: Douglas A. Meyer

Stanley Pearson Posley vs. State
03C01-9809-CR-00307

Tyronne W. Bell vs. State
03C01-9810-CR-00364

State vs. Anthony Sanders
03C01-9811-CR-00392

State vs. Mohammed F. Ali
03C01-9802-CR-00065
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

James Wampler vs. State
03C01-9712-CR-00542
Trial Court Judge: Richard R. Baumgartner

State vs. Robert Sission
W2001-01666-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry Smith
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett
The appellant, Robert A. Sisson, pleaded guilty to third offense driving under the influence of an intoxicant and was sentenced to eleven months and twenty-nine days with actual incarceration for 120 days followed by probation. The appellant, pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Appellate Procedure 37(b)(2)(i), reserved a certified question of law for appeal to this court. That question is whether the 1998 amendments to Tennessee Code Annotated section 55-10-403(a)(1) regarding penalties for D.U.I. convictions violate the ex-post facto and/or due process clauses of the federal and state constitutions. Those amendments increase from ten to twenty years the age of prior D.U.I. convictions that may be used to enhance D.U.I. penalties. Because we find that the defendant committed the instant offense after the effective date of the amendments in question, we find no ex-post facto or due process violations occurred in this case. The judgment of conviction is therefore affirmed.