COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

State vs. Ali
03C01-9704-CR-00163
Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker

State vs. Rutherford
03C01-9705-CR-00172

State vs. Willie Wade
02C01-9709-CC-00359

State vs. Cynthia Starks
02C01-9704-CR-00133
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett

State vs. Bruce Cole
02C01-9708-CC-00324

02C01-9708-CC-00324Cecil
02C01-9708-CC-00324Cecil
Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.

State vs. Juan McAdams
01C01-9704-CR-00140

State vs. Steven Edmonds
01C01-9707-CC-00241
Trial Court Judge: L. Terry Lafferty

Timothy Hickman vs. State
01C01-9711-CR-00527
Trial Court Judge: Joe G. Riley. Jr.

LaCorrick C. Williams, Pro Se vs. State
M2003-00991-CCA-R3-CO
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Stella L. Hargrove
The Petitioner, LaCorrick C. Williams, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The State has filed a motion requesting that this Court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Petitioner fails to assert a cognizable claim for which habeas corpus relief may be granted. Accordingly, the State's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

State vs. Kimberly M. Larson
M1999-00507-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman
This appeal arises from a guilty verdict returned against the defendant for DUI per se for which she received a sentence of eleven months and twenty-nine days, with all but ten days suspended, a $350 fine, court-ordered rehabilitation, and suspension of driving privileges for one year. On appeal, the defendant challenges the admittance of her breathalyzer test results at trial and alleges that her sentence was excessive. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State vs. Electroplating, Inc. and Ross Cunningham
01C01-9612-CR-00535
Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz

State vs. Michael Hughes
01C01-9701-CR-00021
Trial Court Judge: Ann Lacy Johns

01C01-9705-CR-00194
01C01-9705-CR-00194

State vs. Jack Sutton
01C01-9708-CR-00349
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.

State vs. Stogdill
03C01-9507-CC-00188
Trial Court Judge: W. Lee Asbury

State vs. Garrison
03C01-9601-CR-00050
Trial Court Judge: William M. Dender

State vs. Nuchols
03C01-9709-CC-00400

State vs. Chastain
03C01-9706-CR-00205

State vs. Haycraft
03C01-9705-CR-00196

State vs. Daniel
03C01-9709-CR-00404

State of Tennessee vs. Donald Gene Brooks
01C01-9703-CC-00099
Authoring Judge: Judge Curwood Witt
Trial Court Judge: Judge John H. Gasaway, III

The defendant, Donald Gene Brooks, stands convicted of first degree felony murder, especially aggravated robbery, theft of property valued over $1,000, and setting fire to personal property, all related to the robbery and killing of Joseph J. Wisniewski. He received his convictions following a jury trial in the Montgomery County Criminal Court. Brooks is incarcerated in the Department of Correction serving his effective sentence of life plus 27 years. In this direct appeal, Brooks challenges the sufficiency of the convicting evidence and the length of sentence imposed. Having reviewed the record and the briefs of the parties, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee vs. Devon Welles
01C01-9706-CC-00230
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Charles Lee

The Defendant, Devon Wells, appeals his convictions of two counts of sale of a Schedule II controlled substan ce following a jury trial in the Lincoln County Circu it Court. The trial court sentenced him as a Range II Multiple Offender to two consecutive sentences of nine (9) and seven (7) years. He was also fined a total of $100,000 for the two convictions. In this appeal, Defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and that the sentence imposed was excessive and contrary to law. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee vs. Anthony P. Geanes
02C01-9709-CC-00373
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood

The Defendant, Anthony P. Geanes, appeals as of right from his conviction in the Circuit Court of Hardeman County. Following a jury trial, Defendant was convicted of delivery of a Schedule II con trolled substance. He was sentenced to serve fifteen (15) years as a Range II Offender. In this appeal, Defendant challenges the sufficien cy of the evidence and the length of his sentence. We affirm the judgm ent of the trial court.

State of Tennessee vs. Amanda Treece
02C01-9711-CC-00438
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Franklin Murchison

Following an evidentiary hearing, the Circuit Court of Chester County entered an order which revoked Defendant’s probation and ordered her to serve her original sentence of four (4) years in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The Defendant, Amanda Treece, appeals from that action of the trial court. W hile Defendant does not challenge the revocation of probation, she argues in her sole issue on appeal that the trial court erred by requiring her to serve her entire sentence by incarceration in the Department of Correction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.