COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS | Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

State vs. Larry Jones 02C01-9708-CR-00331	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Larry Pittman 02C01-9704-CC-00138	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Charles Taylor 02C01-9704-CR-00153	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. Danny Walker 02C01-9706-CC-00218 Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.	Crockett	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/22/98
State vs. James Transou 02C01-9703-CC-00125 Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. Larry Cunningham 02C01-9709-CC-00336	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. Robert Howell 02C01-9705-CR-00194	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. Timmy Fulton 02C01-9706-CC-00223	Lauderdale	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. George Tucker 02C01-9707-CR-00249	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/21/98
State vs. Max Martin 01C01-9609-CR-00415	Putnam	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/20/98
Gregory Jones vs. State 01C01-9706-CR-00226	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/16/98
William Kirk Riley, Pro Se vs. State M2002-02302-CCA-OT-CO Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles Trial Court Judge: Cheryl A. Blackburn The Petitioner, William Kirk Riley, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The State has filed a motion requesting that this Court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Petitioner fails to assert a cognizable claim for which habeas corpus relief may be granted. Accordingly, the State's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
State vs. Charles Allen M2002-03144-CCA-R3-PC Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr. The Defendant, Charles Ray Allen, was convicted by a jury of first degree premeditated murder and attempted voluntary manslaughter. The Defendant subsequently filed for post-conviction relief alleging, among other things, ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Defendant now appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
State vs. James Pinkerton 01C01-9706-CC-00220	Cannon	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
Robert Moore vs.State 01C01-9712-CC-00580	Maury	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
03C01-9709-CR-00342 03C01-9709-CR-00342 Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner		Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
Provencher vs. State 03C01-9704-CR-00147 Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker	Washington	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/15/98
State vs. Johnny Clark 02C01-9708-CR-00307 Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/14/98
State vs.Collins 03C01-9704-CR-00127 Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner	Hamblen	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/14/98
State vs. Friedman 03C01-9704-CR-00140 Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown	Carter	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/14/98
State vs. Scotty White 02C01-9709-CC-00372 Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley	Hardin	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/13/98
Terrance B. Smith v. State of Tennessee W2004-02366-CCA-R3-PC Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III	Tipton	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/12/98
State of Tennessee vs. Bonnie Stillwell 03C01-9610-CC-00366 Authoring Judge: Judge William M. Barker Trial Court Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr. The appellant, Bonnie Stillwell, appeals as of right the Blount County Circuit Court’s order to revoke her probation. She contends that the trial court’s order was improper in light of her efforts to comply with the terms of probation. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/08/98
State of Tennessee vs. James Ray Bartlett 01C01-9509-CC-00302 Authoring Judge: Judge Gary R. Wade Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Charles Lee The defendant, James Ray Bartlett, was indicted for DUI, driving on a revoked license, five counts of reckless driving, resisting arrest, evading arrest and reckless endangerment. At the close of the state's proof, the trial court granted the defendant's motion for acquittal as to the charge of resisting arrest. The jury rendered guilty verdicts as to the remaining counts. After setting aside the conviction for reckless endangerment, the trial court sentenced the defendant to ten months for the DUI; four months and fifteen days for driving on a revoked license; five months for the reckless driving convictions, all of which were merged as one offense; and ten months for evading arrest. The transcript of the trial indicates sentences were ordered to be served consecutively for an effective sentence of twenty-nine months fifteen days with the minimum service at seventy-five percent. The judgment form indicates concurrent sentencing for all new convictions. The trial court revoked the defendant's community corrections sentence for prior convictions; these new sentences were ordered to be served consecutively to the prior offenses according to the judgment form.	Lincoln	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/07/98
State of Tennessee vs. Mark Maybrey 01C01-9703-CC-00117 Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley Trial Court Judge: Judge J. S. Daniel The Rutherford County grand jury returned indictments charging the defendant, Mark F. Maybrey, with three (3) counts of telephone harassment. The defendant applied for pretrial diversion, which was denied by the District Attorney General. Defendant filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Rutherford County Circuit Court, seeking to overturn the District Attorney’s denial of diversion. After a hearing, the trial court found that the District Attorney had not abused his discretion. Pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 9, defendant brings this interlocutory appeal, claiming the trial court erred in finding that the District Attorney General had not abused his discretion in denying diversion. We find no error; therefore, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.	Rutherford	Court of Criminal Appeals	04/07/98