State vs. James Fernandez
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Donnie Benson vs. State
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Irick vs. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Donald Spicer
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Of This Case Are Analogous To The Facts In State v. Hoyt, 928 S.W.2D 935 (Tenn.
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Aubrey Brigance
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Danny Anderson
|
Crockett | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gregory Simmons
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9611-CC-00473
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CR-00516
|
Overton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9704-CR-00141
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Thomas
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Myron Garmon
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Roger Kimmel
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Roger Kimmel
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9703-CR-00098
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Roe
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Cavious Watkins
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Mitchell vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Logan vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
McDonald vs. State
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Venson Earl Woodard
A Bedford County Circuit Court jury found Appellant Venson Woodard guilty of two counts of aggravated assault. As a Range II multiple offender, he received a sentence of nine years and eight months in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The trial court ordered the sentence to be served consecutive to a sente nce for which Appellant was on parole at the tim e of the offense. In this appeal, Appellant presents the following issue for review: whether the trial court violated its duty to act as a thirteenth juror by refusing to grant Appellant’s motion for a new trial. Specifically Appellant maintains the weight of the evidence shows he was acting in self-defense. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial co urt. |
Bedford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Buffy Twadell
The defendant, Buffy Mae Twadell, has been indicted on two counts of aggravated perjury. Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-16-703. The district attorney general denied the defendant's application for pretrial diversion. Thereafter, the trial court denied her petition for a writ of certiorari. In this extraordinary appeal made pursuant to Rule 10 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure, the defendant insists that the district attorney general abused his discretion by the denial of pretrial diversion. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Phillip Pomeroy vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Phillip W. Pomeroy, appeals the trial court's dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief. The single issue presented for review is whether the petition is barred by the statute of limitations. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Tyrone Watkins
The defendant, Tyrone Watkins, was convicted on July 18, 1994, of two Class A misdemeanors. While allowing pretrial jail credit, the trial court imposed consecutive sentences of eleven months and twenty-nine days, the remainder of which was to be served on probation. On February 16, 1996, a warrant was issued which resulted in the revocation of probation. The question of law certified for review is whether the probationary term had expired prior to the commencement of the revocation proceeding. Rule 37(b)(2)(i), Tenn. R. Crim. P. We must reverse the judgment of the trial court; the cause is dismissed. |
Sumner | Court of Criminal Appeals |