State vs. James Dantes
|
Hardeman | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carl Saine
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Gregg vs. State
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Garrett vs. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Gayle Parsons
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9610-CC-00429
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Scotty Wright
|
Putnam | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9612-CR-00528
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. William Watkins and Jonathan Davis
|
Maury | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pendergrass
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pendergrass
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carlito Adams
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Vanderford
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jose Holmes
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sprinkle vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Russell vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Keith Scarbrough vs. State
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Rippy
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bill Teal
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Knapp
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Napoleon Momon vs. State of Tennessee
The petitioner, Napoleon Momon, appeals pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure from the Hamilton County Criminal Court’s denial of post-conviction relief. The petitioner was convicted in 1991 of second degree murder in the shooting death of his wife, Jacqueline Daniel Momon, and received a twenty-five-year sentence.1 His conviction was affirmed on direct appeal to this Court. State v. Napoleon Momon, No. 03C01-9205-CR-00174 (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, Nov. 20, 1992). |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Anthony Noe
VANDALISM CONVICTION AFFIRMED; FALSE REPORT CONVICTION REVERSED |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Brenda Starks
The appellant, Brenda Starks (defendant), appeals as of right from the judgment of the trial court affirming the sentence, as amended, imposed by the General Sessions Court of Wilson County. After the defendant entered a plea of guilty to passing a worthless check, a Class A misdemeanor, she was sentenced to serve 364 days at 100% in the Wilson County Jail. Her entire sentence was suspended and she was placed on unsupervised probation. The General Sessions Court subsequently revoked the probation, and she appealed to the Criminal Court for Wilson County. The trial court affirmed the judgment of the General Session Court, but amended the judgment. The amended judgment provided for confinement in the Wilson County Jail for 364 days at 75%. In this court, the defendant contends: [T]he sentence she was given by the Criminal Court for Wilson |
Wilson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Austin Kipling Stratton
Defendant, Austin Kipling Stratton, seeks review of his consecutive sentences totaling twenty (20) years for various drug offenses. The sentences resulted from a plea of guilty. We find that the notice of appeal was untimely filed, and no relief is merited under Tenn. R. Crim. P. 35(b). Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Willie Demorris Locust
The petitioner, Willie Demorris Locust, appeals the Dyer County Circuit Court's denial of his petition for post conviction relief. Locust is incarcerated in the Department of Correction for his convictions of aggravated sexual battery and aggravated burglary, for which he received an effective ten year sentence that he is serving consecutively to a twenty year sentence for aggravated rape and aggravated burglary and an assault sentence of undisclosed length. See State v. Locust, 914 S.W.2d 554 (Tenn. Crim. App.) (aggravated sexual battery and aggravated burglary), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 1995); State v. Willie Demorris Locust, No. 02-C-01-9404-CC-00075 (Tenn. Crim. App., Jackson, Oct. 5, 1994) (aggravated rape and aggravated burglary), perm. app. denied (Tenn. 1995). In this appeal, he claims the lower court erred in denying him relief on three issues: 1. Whether the indictment is defective and his conviction of aggravated sexual battery is therefore void. Following a review of the record, we affirm the lower court's dismissal of Locust's petition. |
Dyer | Court of Criminal Appeals |