COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

State vs. Danny Walker
02C01-9706-CC-00218
Trial Court Judge: Dick Jerman, Jr.

State vs. Larry Pittman
02C01-9704-CC-00138

State vs. Charles Taylor
02C01-9704-CR-00153

State vs. Larry Jones
02C01-9708-CR-00331

State vs. Timmy Fulton
02C01-9706-CC-00223

State vs. Robert Howell
02C01-9705-CR-00194

State vs. George Tucker
02C01-9707-CR-00249

State vs. James Transou
02C01-9703-CC-00125
Trial Court Judge: John Franklin Murchison

State vs. Larry Cunningham
02C01-9709-CC-00336

State vs. Max Martin
01C01-9609-CR-00415

Gregory Jones vs. State
01C01-9706-CR-00226

State vs. Charles Allen
M2002-03144-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.
The Defendant, Charles Ray Allen, was convicted by a jury of first degree premeditated murder and attempted voluntary manslaughter. The Defendant subsequently filed for post-conviction relief alleging, among other things, ineffective assistance of counsel at trial. After an evidentiary hearing, the trial court denied relief, and the Defendant now appeals. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

William Kirk Riley, Pro Se vs. State
M2002-02302-CCA-OT-CO
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Cheryl A. Blackburn
The Petitioner, William Kirk Riley, appeals the trial court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The State has filed a motion requesting that this Court affirm the trial court's denial of relief pursuant to Rule 20, Rules of the Court of Criminal Appeals. The Petitioner fails to assert a cognizable claim for which habeas corpus relief may be granted. Accordingly, the State's motion is granted and the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Provencher vs. State
03C01-9704-CR-00147
Trial Court Judge: William M. Barker

03C01-9709-CR-00342
03C01-9709-CR-00342
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner

State vs. James Pinkerton
01C01-9706-CC-00220

Robert Moore vs.State
01C01-9712-CC-00580

State vs.Collins
03C01-9704-CR-00127
Trial Court Judge: James E. Beckner

State vs. Friedman
03C01-9704-CR-00140
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

State vs. Johnny Clark
02C01-9708-CR-00307
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley

State vs. Scotty White
02C01-9709-CC-00372
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Terrance B. Smith v. State of Tennessee
W2004-02366-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David G. Hayes
Trial Court Judge: Joseph H. Walker, III

State of Tennessee vs. Bonnie Stillwell
03C01-9610-CC-00366
Authoring Judge: Judge William M. Barker
Trial Court Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

The appellant, Bonnie Stillwell, appeals as of right the Blount County Circuit Court’s order to revoke her probation. She contends that the trial court’s order was improper in light of her efforts to comply with the terms of probation. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee vs. Jesse C. Gudger, III
03C01-9703-CC-00107
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

The defendant, Jessee C. Gudger, III, appeals as of right from his conviction by a jury in the Sullivan County Circuit Court for robbery, a Class C felony. The defendant was sentenced as a Range I, standard offender to five years in the custody of the Department of Correction. The trial court ordered the defendant to serve his sentence consecutively to a sentence imposed in an unrelated case. The defendant contends that:

(1) the evidence is insufficient to support the conviction;
(2) the trial court erred by denying his motion to suppress a statement given to the police;
(3) the trial court erred by denying his special request to instruct the jury on voluntary intoxication; and
(4) the trial court erred by sentencing him to five years in the Department of Correction.

We disagree and affirm the trial court’s judgment of conviction.

State of Tennessee vs. Mark Maybrey
01C01-9703-CC-00117
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. S. Daniel

The Rutherford County grand jury returned indictments charging the defendant, Mark F. Maybrey, with three (3) counts of telephone harassment. The defendant applied for pretrial diversion, which was denied by the District Attorney General. Defendant filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the Rutherford County Circuit Court, seeking to overturn the District Attorney’s denial of diversion. After a hearing, the trial court found that the District Attorney had not abused his discretion. Pursuant to Tenn. R. App. P. 9, defendant brings this interlocutory appeal, claiming the trial court erred in finding that the District Attorney General had not abused his discretion in denying diversion. We find no error; therefore, the judgment of the trial court is AFFIRMED.