State of Tennessee vs. Gerome J. Smith
The Defendant, Gerome J. Smith, appeals as of right from a conviction of first degree murder following a jury trial in the Sumner County Criminal Court. Defendant was subsequently sentenced to life imprisonment. In this appeal, Defendant argues that the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to allow a rational trier of fact to conclude that the Defendant committed premeditated firstdegree murder. We affirm the judgment of the trial co urt. |
Court of Criminal Appeals | ||
State vs. Tracy Stigall
Defendant, Tracey E. Stigall, was convicted by a Shelby County jury of the offense of aggravated burglary. The sole issue in this direct appeal is whether the trial court erred in failing to charge lesser offenses. We AFFIRM the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Rogers L. McKinley
The appellant, Rogers L. McKinley, appeals the Bledsoe County Criminal Court’s dismissal of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. In 1990, the appellant entered guilty pleas and was convicted of two counts of rape and one count of aggravated burglary. The trial court sentenced the appellant as a Range II multiple offender to concurrent sentences of fifteen (15) years for each rape and ten (10) years for the aggravated burglary. No direct appeal was taken from those convictions and sentences.
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Freddie King
The appellant, Freddie King (petitioner), appeals as of right from a judgment of the trial court dismissing his action for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. In this court, the petitioner contends (a) his guilty pleas were not voluntarily, intelligently, and understandingly entered and (b) the trial court failed to advise him of his constitutional right against self-incrimination before questioning him during the submission hearing. After a thorough review of the record, the briefs submitted by the parties, and the law governing the issues presented for review, it is the opinion of this court that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Keith Henderson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Reginald Thompson
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Clyde Edgeston
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Richard Patterson , et al
|
Henry | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Mark Tyre
|
Lake | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Boston
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carla Smith
|
Montgomery | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Justice
|
Lauderdale | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. James Hathaway
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Hutchison vs. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Kidd
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9703-CC-00088
|
Grainger | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Hibbard vs. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Birchfield
|
Loudon | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Lewis vs. State
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Wells vs. State
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Dillingham vs. State
|
Unicoi | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Holt. vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Davis vs. State
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sheets vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Walde vs. State
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals |