COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OPINIONS

State vs.Donald Middlebrooks
01C01-9606-CR-00230

Irick vs. State
03C01-9608-CR-00304
Trial Court Judge: Ray L. Jenkins

Billie Russell vs. Pakkala M.D.
02A01-9703-CV-00053
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Alonzo Watson
01C01-9606-CC-00260

Donnie Benson vs. State
01C01-9708-CR-00324

State vs. James Fernandez
01C01-9609-CR-00394
Trial Court Judge: Ann Lacy Johns

State vs. Gregory Simmons
02C01-9611-CR-00432
Trial Court Judge: Carolyn Wade Blackett

State vs. Danny Anderson
02C01-9707-CC-00241

State vs. Aubrey Brigance
02C01-9709-CR-00342

State vs. Donald Spicer
02C01-9610-CR-00369

Of This Case Are Analogous To The Facts In State v. Hoyt, 928 S.W.2D 935 (Tenn.
02C01-9610-CR-00369Cecil
Trial Court Judge: Arthur T. Bennett

01C01-9612-CR-00516
01C01-9612-CR-00516

01C01-9704-CR-00141
01C01-9704-CR-00141
Trial Court Judge: Seth W. Norman

01C01-9611-CC-00473
01C01-9611-CC-00473
Trial Court Judge: J. S. Daniel

Mitchell vs. State
03C01-9704-CR-00125
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

McDonald vs. State
03C01-9703-CC-00103
Trial Court Judge: Steve R. Bebb

Logan vs. State
03C01-9610-CR-00387

State vs. John Thomas
02C01-9611-CR-00436
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

State vs. Myron Garmon
02C01-9611-CR-00437
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

State vs. John Roe
02C01-9702-CR-00054
Trial Court Judge: Jon Kerry Blackwood

State vs. Cavious Watkins
02C01-9701-CR-00031
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

State vs. Roger Kimmel
02C01-9701-CR-00006
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

State vs. Roger Kimmel
02C01-9701-CR-00006
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Dailey

03C01-9703-CR-00098
03C01-9703-CR-00098
Trial Court Judge: R. Jerry Beck

State of Tennessee vs. Venson Earl Woodard
01C01-9511-CC-00379
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Charles Lee

A Bedford County Circuit Court jury found Appellant Venson Woodard guilty of two counts of aggravated assault. As a Range II multiple offender, he received a sentence of nine years and eight months in the Tennessee Department of Correction. The trial court ordered the sentence to be served consecutive to a sente nce for which Appellant was on parole at the tim e of the offense. In this appeal, Appellant presents the following issue for review: whether the trial court violated its duty to act as a thirteenth juror by refusing to grant Appellant’s motion for a new trial. Specifically Appellant maintains the weight of the evidence shows he was acting in self-defense.
 

After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial co urt.