General Electric Company v. Process Control Company

Case Number
01S01-9707-FD-00148

This case comes to us on a certified question of law. The plaintiff, General Electric Company ("G.E."), filed this action for contribution against Process Control Company ("Process Control"). Process Control filed a motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment arguing that Tennessee law does not permit a right of contribution in this case. The district court entered an order requesting this Court to address the following certified question of law: In actions that accrue after the decision in McIntyre v. Balentine, under what circumstances is a claim for contribution appropriate under Tennessee Law? We accepted certification of the question. We hold that under the facts as certified an action for contribution may be viable.

Authoring Judge
Justice Janice M. Holder
Originating Judge
Judge James D. Todd
Case Name
General Electric Company v. Process Control Company
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
generale.pdf20.89 KB