Case Number
M2002-00995-SC-R11-CV
JANICE M. HOLDER, J., concurring.
I agree with the majority that the complaint alleges sufficient facts to withstand a motion to
dismiss. I write separately, however, because I believe the majority’s analysis unnecessarily creates
confusion by using foreseeability in analyzing both duty and proximate causation.
Originating Judge
Judge Clara W. Byrd
Case Name
Cindy R. Lourcey v. Estate of Charles Scarlett, Deceased - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
LourceyC.pdf13.65 KB