Roger Hickman v. State of Tennessee

Case Number
E2002-01916-SC-R11-PC

We granted Roger L. Hickman permission to appeal to consider whether the trial court and Court of Criminal Appeals erred in dismissing his habeas corpus petition. Hickman's petition, prepared with the aid of counsel, alleged that his 1986 misdemeanor conviction, for which he received a ten-day suspended sentence, is void because the judgment does not affirmatively indicate that Hickman was represented by counsel or that he waived his right to counsel. We hold that the trial court and Court of Criminal Appeals properly dismissed the petition. The petition failed to comply with the prescribed statutory form, failed to allege that Hickman is "imprisoned or restrained of his liberty," as required by Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-21-101 (2000), and failed to allege grounds for habeas corpus relief. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

Authoring Judge
Justice Frank F. Drowota, III
Originating Judge
Judge Ray L. Jenkins
Case Name
Roger Hickman v. State of Tennessee
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
HickmanR.pdf59.47 KB