State of Tennessee v. Charles Damien Darden
We granted this appeal to decide (1) whether the circuit court had jurisdiction over criminal charges that were not addressed in juvenile court during the transfer hearing; and (2) whether the amendment to Tennessee Code Annotated section 37-1- 159(d) (Supp. 1999), generally eliminating the requirement for an acceptance hearing, is unconstitutional. After examining the record and considering the arguments of the parties and applicable law, we conclude that the circuit court properly exercised jurisdiction over the criminal charges transferred from juvenile court as well as over the additional charges found in the grand jury’s indictment. In addition, we conclude that the General Assembly did not act unconstitutionally in eliminating the requirement for an acceptance hearing. Accordingly, for the reasons herein, we affirm the Court of Criminal Appeals. |
Supreme Court | ||
Gragg vs. Gragg
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Daniel
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Daniel
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Danny Spradlin
|
Blount | Supreme Court | |
Brown vs. Wal-Mart
|
Lawrence | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Howard Brown
|
Knox | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Howard Brown
|
Supreme Court | ||
Ashe vs. Radiation Oncology Assoc., et al
|
Supreme Court | ||
Lamar Fletcher v. State of Tennessee
In this appeal we address two primary issues: (1) whether an indigent party is liable for payment of outstanding litigation taxes levied under Tennessee Code Annotated section 67-4-602 (1998), and (2) whether the Tennessee Department of Correction had authority to withdraw money from an inmate’s trust account to pay a distress warrant. For the reasons stated herein, we hold that indigent parties become liable for litigation taxes when taxed by the court and that the Tennessee Department of Correction has the authority to deduct money from an inmate trust fund to satisfy a distress warrant. We affirm the judgment of the Court of Appeals. |
Jackson | Supreme Court | |
Edmonds vs. Wilson Co., et al
|
Wilson | Supreme Court | |
State vs. Legg
|
Supreme Court | ||
Wells vs. TN Board of Regents, et al
|
Supreme Court | ||
State vs. Cook
|
Coffee | Supreme Court | |
King vs. Jowers
|
Supreme Court | ||
W1995-00004-SC-R11-PC
|
Hardin | Supreme Court | |
E1997-00044-SC-R11-CV
|
Supreme Court | ||
E1997-00044-SC-R11-CV
|
Supreme Court | ||
M1997-00040-SC-WCM-CV
|
Supreme Court | ||
King vs. Jowers
|
Supreme Court | ||
Heck Van Tran vs. State of TN
|
Supreme Court | ||
02-S-9909-CR-0087
|
Supreme Court | ||
W1997-00034-SC-R11-CV
|
Lake | Supreme Court | |
E1998-00248-SC-WCM-CV
|
Supreme Court | ||
03S01-9812-CV-00137
|
Sevier | Supreme Court |
