SUPREME COURT OPINIONS

Terry E. Wood v. State of Tennessee
01S01-9501-CC-00015
Authoring Judge: Justice Adolpho A. Birch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Donald P. Harris

We granted the application of Terry E. Wood, the defendant, for permission to appeal in order to resolve an issue of first impression in Tennessee: whether the return of a sealed presentment 1 engages an accursed person's speedy trial rights under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, § 9 , of the Tennessee Constitution. After a thorough examination of the reocrd and careful consideration of the issue, we conclude, for reasons appearing below, that the reutnr of a presentment, whether sealed or unsealed, whether the accompanying capias is executed or unexecuted, is a formal accusation that engages constitutional speedy trial provisions. Thus, we must apply the criteria of Barkery.Wingo 2 and state b. Bishop 3 to determine whether the thirteen-year delay in this case deprived the appellant of this constitutional speedy trial rights. We find that there was no such deprivation and affirm the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeals.

 

Williamson Supreme Court

01S01-9503-CH-00045
01S01-9503-CH-00045
Trial Court Judge: Robert S. Brandt

Davidson Supreme Court

02S01-9504-CR-00029
02S01-9504-CR-00029
Trial Court Judge: Joseph B. Mccartie

Shelby Supreme Court

03S01-9503-CH-00027
03S01-9503-CH-00027

Supreme Court

03S01-9502-CV-00014
03S01-9502-CV-00014
Trial Court Judge: Dale C. Workman

Knox Supreme Court

01S01-9508-CH-00138
01S01-9508-CH-00138
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.

Supreme Court

01S01-9504-CV-00047
01S01-9504-CV-00047

Supreme Court

Gene v. Aaby,
03S01-9507-CH-00073

Supreme Court

Gene v. Aaby,
03S01-9507-CH-00073

Supreme Court

01S01-9505-CH-00083
01S01-9505-CH-00083

Supreme Court

02S01-9410-CR-00071
02S01-9410-CR-00071

Shelby Supreme Court

In Re: Estate of Mary T. Austin, Deceased, Elizabeth T. Austin, v .Christy N. Austin and Robert C. Austin C., Jr.
03S01-9410-PB-00092
Authoring Judge: Justice Lyle Reid
Trial Court Judge: Chancellor Dennis H. Inman

This case presents for review the decision of the probate court, affimred by the Court of Appeals, that the personal representative in this case may, in his discretion, distribute certain corporate stock in kind rather than sell the stock and distribute the proceeds. The decision miscontrues applicable law and is reversed.

Knox Supreme Court

02S01-9502-CR-00019
02S01-9502-CR-00019
Trial Court Judge: H. T. Lockard

Shelby Supreme Court

02S01-9505-CV-00036
02S01-9505-CV-00036
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown

Supreme Court

03S01-9505-CH-00060
03S01-9505-CH-00060

Supreme Court

03S01-9505-CV-00047
03S01-9505-CV-00047

Supreme Court

01S01-9303-CC-00052
01S01-9303-CC-00052

Supreme Court

03S01-9502-CH-00017
03S01-9502-CH-00017

Supreme Court

01S01-9303-CC-00052
01S01-9303-CC-00052

Supreme Court

02S01-9502-CV-00015
02S01-9502-CV-00015
Trial Court Judge: C. Creed Mcginley

Supreme Court

02S01-9501-CV-00008
02S01-9501-CV-00008
Trial Court Judge: Joe C. Morris

Supreme Court

02S01-9502-CV-00015
02S01-9502-CV-00015

Supreme Court

01S01-9411-CR-00138
01S01-9411-CR-00138

Supreme Court

02S01-9505-CC-00044
02S01-9505-CC-00044
Trial Court Judge: Whit A. Lafon

Supreme Court

01S01-9402-CV-00149
01S01-9402-CV-00149
Trial Court Judge: Robert E. Burch

Supreme Court