Gladys Davis ("Plaintiff") filed this retaliatory discharge case against her former employer, Nissan North America, Inc. ("Defendant"). Plaintiff claims Defendant retaliated against her for filing several workers' compensation claims. Prior to Plaintiff's discharge, she underwent a comprehensive medical examination and, based on this examination, two physicians who are board certified in occupational and preventive medicine opined that there was a high risk of re-injury should Plaintiff be returned to work. Relying on the medical opinions of these two physicians, Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. The Trial Court concluded, among other things, that Defendant had negated an essential element of Plaintiff's claim and Defendant, therefore, was entitled to summary judgment as a matter of law. Plaintiff appeals, and we affirm.
Case Number
              M2009-02579-COA-R3-CV
          Originating Judge
              Chancellor Robert E. Corlew, III
          Case Name
              Gladys Davis v. Nissan North America, Inc.
          Date Filed
              Dissent or Concur
              No
          Download PDF Version
              DavisGOPN.pdf144 KB
           
                                  



