Case Number
E1998-00060-SC-R11-CV
The majority holds that Mr. Bogan’s ability to provide support has been significantly reduced based solely upon a unilateral, voluntary decision to retire. If Mr. Bogan currently is unable to pay Ms. Bogan the alimony she was awarded at the time of the divorce, it is only because Mr. Bogan became dissatisfied with his job and voluntarily decided to leave. His employment was not terminated or in danger of termination. Mr. Bogan decided to retire despite his existing obligation to his former wife. I therefore cannot agree with the majority’s decision to reduce Ms. Bogan’s alimony and must respectfully dissent.
Originating Judge
Judge John S. Mclellan, III
Case Name
Richard Thomas Bogan v. Doris Mae Bogan - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version
boganrtDC.pdf21.88 KB