City of Knoxville v. Knox County, Tennessee

Case Number
M2006-00916-COA-R3-CV

The issue on appeal in this annexation dispute between the annexing city and the county is which tax allocation statute controls the allocation of Local Option Revenue derived from the annexed territory: the one in effect when the city passed the annexation ordinance on final reading, or the one in effect when the annexation ordinance became operative following a protracted quo warranto action. The city, which annexed valuable retail and commercial property, contends the tax scheme in effect in 1995 when the ordinance passed final reading applies. The county contends Tenn. Code Ann. § 6-51-115(b)(2) (1998), which was enacted after the ordinance was passed by the city, applies because it was in effect when the ordinance became operative. The Chancellor ruled in favor of the city, finding the statute in effect when the city passed the annexation ordinance applies. We reverse finding Tenn. Code Ann. § 6-51-115(b)(2) (1998), which was in effect when the ordinance became operative, controls the allocation of tax revenue from the annexed territory.

Authoring Judge
Judge Frank G. Clement, Jr.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Claudia C. Bonnyman
Case Name
City of Knoxville v. Knox County, Tennessee
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version