Case Number
W1999-01252-COA-R3-CV
This appeal arises from a dispute regarding whether Plaintiff B& H was entitled to a deficiency judgment following a foreclosure sale of Defendants' property. Despite Defendant Brooks' counter-claim of fraud in the sale, the court found that Plaintiff was entitled to a deficiency judgment. Defendant Brooks' motion for new trial or for an amendment of the findings of fact was denied. Brooks appeals this denial.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Joe C. Morris
Case Name
B&H Investments, Inc., v. James W. Brooks
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
B&HInvestments.pdf22.41 KB