I concur with the majority that a conviction on a greater offense does not preclude a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel for the failure to request jury instructions on lesser included offenses. Although a small number of recent opinions by the Court of Criminal Appeals have held otherwise, most panels have endorsed the traditional view that the trial court has the obligation to provide instructions on the charged offense and all lesser included offenses warranted by the proof at trial, and that defense counsel, absent a reasonably based strategy, has the duty to seek instructions on all lesser included offenses. In contrast to the majority, I believe that trial counsel in this instance provided constitutionally inadequate representation by failing to request an instruction on facilitation as a lesser included offense of the sale of ecstasy within a school zone. I must, therefore, respectfully dissent to the extent that I would grant a new trial.
Case Number
M2012-01560-SC-R11-PC
Originating Judge
Judge Steve Dozier
Case Name
Calvin Eugene Bryant v. State of Tennessee - CONCUR IN PART AND DISSENT IN PART
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
bryantcalvindis.opn_.pdf117.15 KB