Cyrus Deville Wilson v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting

Case Number
M2009-02241-CCA-R3-CO

I dissent from the majority opinion because I conclude that the allegations contained in the Petitioner’s petition for a writ of error coram nobis are insufficient to demonstrate that he is entitled to relief. As such, I do not think that the coram nobis court erred when it summarily dismissed the petition without an evidentiary hearing.

Authoring Judge
Judge David H. Welles
Originating Judge
Judge Seth Norman
Case Name
Cyrus Deville Wilson v. State of Tennessee - Dissenting
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version