Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams, et al.

Case Number
W2004-00484-COA-R3-CV

Appellant, an insurance company, appeals from trial court’s judgment finding that the
business pursuit and home care service exclusions to personal liability coverage in a homeowners insurance policy did not exclude coverage for accidental death of child who drowned in a bathtub while in the care of Appellee. Trial court found that Appellee’s arrangement to care for decedent was not a business pursuit or home care service within the meaning of the insurance contract, but rather was an informal type of babysitting motivated by love and/or favor for deceased child’s parents. Appellant contends that motivation by profit was irrelevant to whether Appellee was engaged in a business pursuit or home care service, that the evidence preponderates against the trial court’s fact findings, and that trial court erred in finding for Appellees. We reverse the judgment of the trial court, finding that the business pursuit and home care service exclusions do bar coverage under the homeowners policy.
 

Authoring Judge
Presiding Judge W. Frank Crawford
Originating Judge
Judge Jon K. Blackwood
Case Name
Mid-Century Insurance Company v. Virginia Williams, et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
This is a dissenting opinion
Download PDF Version