Case Number
W2006-00629-COA-R3-CV
The parties to a construction contract dispute the enforceability of its arbitration provision. The trial court refused to enforce the arbitration provision. The construction company appealed. The developer argues that the arbitration provision is unenforceable because it did not assent to arbitration, or alternatively, the arbitration provision was induced by fraud or unconscionable. The developer also claims that the defendants waived their right to arbitrate, and that they lack standing to enforce the right to arbitrate. For the following reasons, we reverse the decision of the chancery court and remand for entry of an order compelling arbitration.
Originating Judge
Chancellor Walter L. Evans
Case Name
Robert J. Denley Co., Inc. v. Neal Smith Construction Company, Inc., et al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
RobertJDenleyOPN.pdf128.87 KB