Case Number
W2009-00251-COA-R3-CV
I concur in the Court’s decision but write separately to clarify my view of the evidence as it relates to S.R. I believe that the evidence would support a finding by the trial court, by clear and convincing evidence, that any visitation with Father would result in harm to S.R. However, because the trial court did not make the required finding of harm, I agree with the decision to remand the case on the issue of visitation.
Originating Judge
Judge Daniel L. Smith
Case Name
Cassandra Lynn Rudd v. Howard Thomas Rudd - Concurring
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version