Clair Vanderschaaf, Et Al. v. Victor Bishara, Et Al.

Case Number
M2017-00412-COA-R3-CV

Following his retirement, an alimony obligor petitioned to terminate his alimony. The parties agreed that the obligor’s retirement represented a substantial and material change in circumstances since the original support decree. But the obligor also conceded his ability to pay the alimony. Following a hearing, the trial court determined that the obligor failed to meet his burden of proof and denied his request to terminate his alimony obligation. The court also awarded the obligor’s former spouse her attorney’s fees without specifying the basis for the award. On appeal, the obligor argues, among other things, that his former spouse had the burden of proving her continuing need for alimony once a substantial and material change in circumstances was conceded. We affirm the denial of the request to terminate alimony but vacate the award of attorney’s fees.

Authoring Judge
Judge W. Neal McBrayer
Originating Judge
Chancellor Howard W. Wilson
Case Name
Clair Vanderschaaf, Et Al. v. Victor Bishara, Et Al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version