In this appeal arising from a suit on an indemnity agreement, the indemnitee plaintiff moved for summary judgment. In response, one of the named indemnitors claimed that she could not determine if the signature on the agreement was hers. Another named indemnitor claimed that he was not sure if the signature on the agreement was his but conceded that it could be. And neither purported indemnitor recalled signing the indemnity agreement. The trial court determined that there was no genuine issue of material fact and granted summary judgment. On appeal, the purported indemnitors claim that, because the authenticity of their signatures was in dispute, summary judgment was improper. Alternatively, if summary judgment was appropriate on the issue of liability, the purported indemnitors claim that the trial court erred in its award of damages by including certain unpaid bond premiums and attorney’s fees. We affirm.
Case Number
M2017-00959-COA-R3-CV
Originating Judge
Chancellor Ellen Hobbs Lyle
Case Name
Lexon Insurance Company v. Windhaven Shores, Inc., Et Al.
Date Filed
Dissent or Concur
No
Download PDF Version
lexoninsuranceco.opn_.pdf163.6 KB