Louis Brooks v. Lee Creech M2001-02355-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
This matter involves a fraudulent transfer of real property and violation of Tennessee's Consumer Protection Act occurring as a result of Plaintiff's attempt to obtain a loan using his real property as collateral. In return for a loan of $4000.00, Plaintiff quit claimed his home as collateral and gave Defendant Creech physical possession of the promissory note in exchange for the loan. Defendant Stigall, who had office space in the same office, was listed as trustee of the property and payee on the promissory note. She then represented herself to First American Bank as owner of the property and wife of Defendant Creech, obtaining a loan for $42,000.00 and offering Plaintiff's property as collateral. The trial court found that Defendants Stigall and Creech were involved in a conspiracy and that they violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act and defrauded Plaintiff and First American Bank (now AmSouth Bank). The court reformed the Quitclaim Deed into a Deed of Trust, giving the bank a subrogation in the $4000.00 owed to Defendant Stigall. Only Defendant Stigall appeals. We affirm the trial court's decision in its entirety.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Wendy Layne v. Mark Layne M2002-00670-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Graham
The divorced parents of a fourteen-year-old girl asked the trial court to sign an agreed order to enable her to live with her grandmother so she could attend school in Hamilton County. The trial judge refused to sign the order. While the decision to sign or not to sign such an order is within the sound discretion of the trial court, the court in this case erroneously believed that it lacked jurisdiction over the matter because the parties had not shown a change of circumstances since the prior decree. We find that the proof does show a change of circumstances and that the best interests of the child require the entry of the proposed order. Therefore we reverse.
The trial jury convicted the defendant, Jimmy Ray Cureton, of felony murder and attempted especially aggravated robbery. However, the trial court amended the defendant's attempted especially aggravated robbery conviction to attempted aggravated robbery based on the wording of the defendant's indictment. This Court subsequently reversed the trial court, finding that the indictment language was sufficient to allege attempted especially aggravated robbery. See State v. Cureton, 38 S.W.3d 64, 83-84 (Tenn. Crim. App. 2000). We remanded the case for re-sentencing, and, upon remand, the trial court sentenced the defendant to serve ten years for his attempted especially aggravated robbery conviction consecutively to his life sentence for the felony murder conviction. The defendant now brings this direct appeal contending that his sentence is both (1) excessive and (2) improper because his indictment alleges that he merely committed attempted aggravated robbery. After reviewing the procedural history of this case and the record of the sentencing hearing, we find that neither of the defendant's allegations merits relief.
Knox
Court of Criminal Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Joshua S. Grubb E2001-02205-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge James B. Scott, Jr.
Joshua S. Grubb appeals from the Anderson County Criminal Court's imposition of incarcerative sentencing for his three aggravated burglary and three theft convictions. Contending that the lower court erroneously denied him probation, he asks us to reverse the sentencing orders entered below. We are, however, unpersuaded of the defendant's worthiness for probationary sentences and, therefore, affirm the lower court's judgments.
Anderson
Court of Criminal Appeals
Michael D. Matthews vs. Natasha Story E2002-00517-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: John K. Wilson
This case arises out of an automobile accident in which the plaintiff, Michael D. Matthews, was injured. The plaintiff sued Tammy Y. Morelock ("Morelock"), alleging that Morelock was a passenger in the vehicle the plaintiff was driving and that Morelock's negligence had caused his injuries. When the plaintiff later learned that Natasha Story ("Story") was the passenger in the vehicle and not Morelock, the plaintiff attempted to amend his complaint to add Story as a defendant. The trial court dismissed the plaintiff's claim against Story, holding the statute of limitations barred such an amendment. The trial court also granted Morelock's motion for summary judgment, finding the family purpose doctrine inapplicable. We affirm.
David Andrew Nicholson, Jr., appeals from the Hamilton County Criminal Court's denial of his petition for post-conviction relief. He claims that he was not effectively represented by counsel at his trial and on direct appeal. He also claims that his due process rights were impaired at trial when the court interrupted a defense witness's testimony and played an audio recording of the defendant's statement to the police for the witness. Because the record supports neither allegation, we affirm the lower court's order denying relief.
Defendant, Devon Lee Ramsey, pled guilty to one count of Class D felony theft and three counts of Class E felony forgery. Following a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced Defendant to serve three and one-half years for the theft conviction, and one and one-half years for each of the forgery convictions. The trial court further ordered the sentences for the forgery convictions to be served concurrently with each other, but consecutively to the sentence for theft, for an effective sentence of five years on these convictions. These sentences were further ordered to be served consecutively to an effective sentence of two years for ten forgery convictions in Coffee County. Defendant has appealed arguing that the trial court erred by imposing excessive sentences and by ordering consecutive sentencing. After a review of the entire record, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
Following an evidentiary hearing, the Criminal Court of Sumner County entered an order finding the Defendant, Ronnie Jerome Russell, to be in violation of the conditions of his supervised probation and ordered him to serve his sentence in the Department of Correction. The Defendant appealed arguing that the trial court failed to exercise a "conscientious and intelligent judgment" in finding that he had violated the terms and conditions of probation and in revoking his probation. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Sumner
Court of Criminal Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Clemmie Rhyan W2001-03019-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Joseph M. Tipton
Trial Court Judge: Judge John P. Colton, Jr.
A Shelby County Criminal Court jury convicted the defendant, Clemmie Rhyan, of second degree murder, a Class A felony, and the trial court sentenced him as a Range I, violent offender to twenty-two years in the Department of Correction (DOC). The defendant appeals, claiming (1) that the evidence is insufficient to support his conviction; (2) that the trial court erred by refusing to instruct the jury on self-defense; and (3) that his sentence is excessive. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
State vs. Deborah Rainey W2002-00010-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Rita L. Stotts
This appeal arises from a condemnation proceeding. The trial court awarded the Appellant $38, 040.00 as the fair market value of the property taken and zero dollars for incidental damages to the remaining property. Appellant raises a single issue on appeal. For the following reasons, we dismiss the appeal.
A Shelby County jury convicted the defendant, Donald Johnson, Jr., of first degree murder in perpetration of robbery, and the trial court sentenced him to life. On appeal, this court vacated the judgment of the trial court and remanded for findings relating to the motion to suppress the defendant's statements to police officers. Upon remand, the trial court made additional findings and again denied the motion. Upon reviewing the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Shelby
Court of Criminal Appeals
The Rogers Group vs. Anderson County E2002-00409-COA-R9-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Telford E. Forgerty, Jr.
After case was tried, the Trial Judge recused and another Judge was designated who granted a new trial on all issues. On appeal, we affirm.
Anderson
Court of Appeals
Glenda Cooper vs. State E2002-02415-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
This is a wrongful death action filed against the State of Tennessee with the Tennessee Claims Commission. The State filed a motion for judgment on the pleadings, asserting that it was not liable for the actions of the Bradley County Sheriff, whose negligence is alleged to be the proximate cause of the death of the plaintiff's intestate. The Claims Commission, relying upon the case of Spurlock v. Sumner County, 42 S.W.3d 75 (Tenn. 2001), held that the sheriff was not a state employee but rather a county officer. It dismissed the claim against the State. We affirm.
The Defendant, Dennis Cedric Woodard, Jr., was convicted by a jury of first degree premeditated murder and sentenced to life imprisonment with the possibility of parole. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant argues that the evidence presented at trial is not sufficient to sustain his conviction. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Bedford
Court of Criminal Appeals
Brenda Martin, Executor Est. of Dewey Moore v. Jean Moore M2001-03144-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Vernon Neal
A man who had been diagnosed with dementia executed a power of attorney in favor of his wife. The wife used the power to withdraw all the money from her husband's separately owned bank account, and sent most of it to her brother for investment overseas. She also completed the sale of real property her husband had owned in Kentucky, and placed the proceeds in a marital account. After his death, the man's daughter from a previous marriage brought suit for breach of fiduciary duty, asking for the return of the assets to his estate. The trial court ordered the return of the money taken from the bank account, but ruled that the wife was entitled to keep the proceeds from the sale of the real property. The court also ordered the wife to pay some of the daughter's attorney fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Clay
Court of Appeals
Western Express v. Benchmark Electronics M2001-03151-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy
Western Express, Inc. sued Benchmark Electronics Huntsville, Inc. for detention charges after Western's trailers were unreasonably detained at Benchmark's plant in Pulaski. The Chancery Court of Davidson County granted summary judgment to Benchmark, and Western asserts on appeal that the court erred in finding that the undisputed facts show that Western cannot prevail on its claims. We reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Jet Printing v. Deep South Wholesale Paper M2001-02582-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: Carol L. Mccoy
This is a breach of contract case. A bag manufacturer ordered printed polyethylene film from a printing company, to be made into bags to sell to chicken packaging companies. The film was treated on both sides. Consequently, the bag manufacturer was unable to properly seal the bags. Later shipments of film that were not treated on both sides sealed properly. The bag manufacturer refused to pay for the initial shipment of film that would not seal, so the seller printing company sued for breach of contract. The trial court found for the bag manufacturer, holding that the seller breached both an implied term of the contract and an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose. On appeal, the seller printing company argues that the trial court erred in finding that the film did not conform to the contract and that the seller breached the implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and that the trial court erred in excluding the testimony of the seller's proffered expert. We affirm, finding that the trial court did not err in finding that the seller breached an implied warranty for a particular purpose, nor in excluding the testimony of the seller's expert witness.
Davidson
Court of Appeals
Violet Guarino v. Joseph Corrozzo M2001-02789-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Royce Taylor
The appellant was ordered in a divorce decree to pay his wife a portion of his pension. He attempted to discharge these payments in a bankruptcy proceeding. The Chancery Court of Rutherford County held that the payments were non-dischargeable because they constituted "support, maintenance or alimony" payments which are not dischargeable under the bankruptcy code. On appeal, appellant argues that wife violated the automatic stay injunction by filing in a state court and that she failed to properly object to the discharge. Appellant also argues that the trial court did not have subject matter jurisdiction. We hold that the payments were in the nature of support and, therefore, not a dischargeable debt. This result means that the issues raised by the appellant are moot. We affirm the trial court's decision.
Michael Higgins vs. Sheriff A.C.Gilles Jr. W2001-02829-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos
Petitioner, off-duty deputy sheriff, was arrested during bust of known drug house for possession of drug paraphernalia. Upon deputy sheriff's arrest, Internal Affairs twice ordered petitioner to submit to drug test. At time of requests, petitioner did not have assistance of counsel; however, two Sheriff's Association representatives were present and available for consultation. Petitioner refused both orders, but on third day following arrest, after consulting with an attorney, voluntarily requested drug test. Department refused request, and subsequently charged petitioner with insubordination, possession and use of illegal drugs, and conduct unbecoming an officer. After hearing before the Deputy Chief, petitioner was terminated. Civil Service Merit Board upheld termination, and petitioner filed common law writ of certiorari with chancery court. Chancery court affirmed the Civil Service Merit Board. We affirm.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Christopher Ryan vs. James Surprise W2001-02853-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Holly M. Kirby
Trial Court Judge: George H. Brown
This case involves discovery sanctions. The plaintiff sued the defendants, a lawyer and his law firm, for legal malpractice. The plaintiff requested certain documents from the defendants at least three times, which were not produced. The trial court ordered production of the documents at a deposition. The documents were not produced at the deposition. Twenty-eight days after the deposition, on the eve of a hearing on the defendants' alleged discovery abuses, the documents were produced. In response to the plaintiff's request for sanctions, the trial court ordered that the defendants pay the plaintiff's attorney a monetary sanction. The defendants appeal, arguing that the imposition of the sanction was an abuse of discretion, because there was no evidence indicating the amount of attorney time spent on the alleged discovery abuse and, therefore, no evidentiary basis for the amount of the sanction. We vacate the order of the trial court and remand for further proceedings, because the record does not support the trial court's award.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Raymond Anthony vs. Christine Rodgers W2002-01240-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Rita L. Stotts
This case began as a petition for dependency and neglect but evolved into a custody dispute between the mother and father of a child born out of wedlock. Originally, the mother appealed to the Circuit Court of Shelby County which stayed the order of the Juvenile Court granting custody to the father. The father appealed to this Court pursuant to Rule 10 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure and we remanded this case to the Circuit Court for entry of an order transferring the appeal to this Court as the Circuit Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction. For the following reasons, we affirm the decision of the Juvenile Court.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
James Jordan Jr. vs. Kelly Jordan W2002-00854-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Rita L. Stotts
This case involves the enrollment of a foreign divorce decree, enforcement of the child support obligation therein, and the modification of the visitation privileges set out in the decree. The trial court enrolled the foreign decree, entered judgment for arrearages and child support, and amended the enrolled judgment as to the visitation privileges for Father. Father appeals. We affirm.
Shelby
Court of Appeals
Avis Estes, Etc. v. Edgar Meek M2001-02695-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: Leonard Martin, Chancellor
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employer questions the trial court's finding that the death of Walter B. Estes was the caused by a work related accidental injury. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (21 Supp.) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Chancery Court Affirmed JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP. J., in which ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., and WILLIAM H. INMAN, SR. J., joined. Blakely D. Matthews and Jay N. Chamness, Cornelius & Collins, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Edgar Meek Jerred A. Creasy, Vandivort & Creasy, Charlotte, Tennessee, for the appellee, Avis Estes, surviving spouse of Walter B. Estes MEMORANDUM OPINION The claimant, Avis Estes, initiated this civil action to recover workers' compensation benefits for the allegedly work related death of the employee, her late husband, Walter Estes. By its answer, the employer, Edgar Meek, admitted the employee suffered a compensable injuryby accident on July 1, 1998, but denied that his death on September 29, 1998 was causally related to that accident. After a trial on the merits, the trial court found the accident to be the cause of Mr. Estes's death and awarded benefits to Mrs. Estes. The employer has appealed. For injuries occurring on or after July 1, 1985, appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2) (21 Supp.). The reviewing court is required to conduct an independent examination of the record to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.
Dickson
Workers Compensation Panel
Michael Story v. The Holland Group of Tennessee d/b/a M2001-03078-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace, Judge
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. In this appeal, the employer and its insurer question the trial court's finding relative to the extent of the employee's permanent disability, as being excessive. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the judgment should be affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (21 Supp.) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court Affirmed JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP. J., in which ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., J., and WILLIAM H. INMAN, SR. J., joined. Kenneth M. Switzer, Ruth, Howard, Tate & Sowell, Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellants, The Holland Group of Tennessee d/b/a The Holland Group and CGU Insurance Group Charles L. Hicks, Camden, Tennessee, for the appellee, Michael Story MEMORANDUM OPINION The employee or claimant, Mr. Story, initiated this civil action to recover workers' compensation benefits for a work related injury. The employer, The Holland Group, denied liability. After a trial on October 26, 21, the trial court awarded, among other things, permanent partial disability benefits based on 5 percent to the body as a whole. The employer and its insurer have appealed. Appellate review is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied bya presumption of correctness of the findings of fact, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(2) (21 Supp.). The reviewing court is required to conduct an independent examination of the record to determine where the preponderance of the evidence lies.
