State of Tennessee v. Tracy T. Bostic
M2000-02941-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Timothy L. Easter

The Williamson County Grand Jury returned separate, one-count presentments against the defendant, Tracy T. Bostic, charging him with felony sale or delivery of a controlled substance, in violation of Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-17-417, and with felony sale or delivery of a counterfeit controlled substance, in violation of Code section 39-17-423. The defendant was tried and convicted on the controlled substance charge, and the trial court imposed an incarcerative sentence of nine years as a Range II, multiple offender and assessed a $25,000 fine. The defendant elected to forego a trial on the counterfeit controlled substance charge, and he entered a “blind” guilty plea to that offense, for which he received a three-year incarcerative sentence as a Range II, multiple offender, which was ordered to be served consecutively to the nine-year sentence. On appeal, the defendant contests the sufficiency of the evidence upon which his controlled substance conviction rests, and he complains about the length and manner of service of his combined sentences and about the $25,000 fine. Based upon our review of the video record in this case and our consideration of the briefs of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the defendant’s convictions and the incarcerative portion of his sentences, but we modify the $25,000 fine imposed to $15,000.

Elaine Wynn vs. Joseph Hames
W2001-00269-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge W. Frank Crawford
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn
This a medical malpractice case. Plaintiff's decedent saw Defendant, an emergency room physician, who diagnosed decedent with pneumonia and sent decedent home with antibiotics. Plaintiff's decedent died the next day from congestive heart failure. Plaintiff, wife of decedent, sued Defendant for malpractice. The jury's verdict found decedent 90% at fault and Defendant 10% at fault, and the trial court entered judgment for Defendant on the jury verdict. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

Durnelco, Inc. vs. Double James
E2001-02010-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: W. Frank Brown, III
This case involves the interpretation of a commercial lease agreement. The tenant, Durnelco, Inc. ("Durnelco"), filed a complaint for declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that it properly terminated the lease agreement on July 31, 2000. Durnelco also asked that it be permitted to remove, at its expense, certain improvements made by it to the leasehold premises, including some flooring, walls, doors, windows, bathroom fixtures, and exterior decking. The present landlord, Double James, LLC ("Double James"), answered and filed a counterclaim asserting that Durnelco had breached the lease and had refused to surrender possession of the premises. It sought damages as a result of Durnelco's alleged holdover tenancy. The trial court allowed Durnelco to remove only two signs and certain light fixtures. The court awarded Double James $7,000 in rent for the period of July through December, 2000. Durnelco appeals. We affirm.

William J. Vincent v. Reid Troutman, Executor, Et Al.
2001-03035-COA-R3-CV
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White

April Grant Ingle vs. Robert Wayne Ingle
E2001-02802-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: W. Neil Thomas, III
This is a post-divorce case. The parties were divorced in 1998. On September 21, 2000, April Grant Ingle ("Mother") filed a petition to modify the parties' divorce judgment. She alleged that Robert Wayne Ingle ("Father") had been unemployed at the time of the divorce, and, consequently, was not ordered to pay child support. She further alleged that he had subsequently become employed and that he should now be ordered to pay child support computed pursuant to the Tennessee Child Support Guidelines ("the Guidelines"). Mother also sought to modify Father's visitation as set forth in the divorce judgment. After comparing the parties' respective incomes, the trial court ordered Father to pay child support of $177 per month. Mother appeals. We vacate the trial court's child support award and the effective date of that award. The remainder of the trial court's order is affirmed. This case is remanded to the trial court for such additional proceedings as may be necessary and for the entry of an order consistent with this opinion.

In Re: Madelanie Redman, Ray & Martha Bowen v. Nathan Redman
E2001-02730-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Kindall T. Lawson

In Re: Madelanie Redman, Ray & Martha Bowen v. Nathan Redman
E2001-02730-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks

E2001-02926-COA-R3-CV
E2001-02926-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young

John Sicard vs. Leon Williams, Inc.
E2001-02928-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: W. Dale Young
The Trial Court awarded plaintiff commission under Agreement between the parties. On appeal, we reverse on grounds that plaintiff's misrepresentation in procuring a contract with a third party, denied his contractual right to the commission.

In Re: Mackenzie J. Marlowe, Gregory Marlowe v. Stacy
E2002-00105-COA-R3-JV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: John W. Walton

Floyd Campbell v. State of Tennessee
M2001-00408-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge J. S. Daniel

Petitioner, alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, appeals the trial court's denial of post-conviction relief. Petitioner claims counsel failed to adequately investigate evidence and properly file a motion for new trial and an amended motion for new trial. We conclude counsel was not ineffective and affirm the post-conviction court's judgment.

Michele Renee Smith v. Cookeville Regional Medical
M2001-00982-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: James L. Weatherford, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: John J. Madduxjudge
The defendant appeals the judgment of the trial court finding that the employee, an ICU nurse: 1) suffered a back injury while caring for a patient that aggravated her pre-existing back condition; 2) gave proper notice of her injury under the circumstances; and 3) sustained a 17% anatomical impairment and 37% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole. We hold that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's findings. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

George v. Clarendon National Ins.
M2000-02125-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: James L. Weatherford, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: Charles D. Haston, Chancellor
The defendants contend that the trial court erred in awarding the plaintiff 5% permanent partial disability to the right arm and 65% permanent partial disability to his left arm for injuries sustained when he slipped on ice and fell while stretching a tarpaulin over a flatbed trailer which led to diagnoses and surgery for carpal tunnel syndrome in both wrists and chronic lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow) of his left elbow. The defendants also contend the trial court abused its discretion in commuting a portion of the award to Mr. George to a lump sum amount. After a complete review of the entire record, the briefs of the parties, and the applicable law, We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Lindell Hollingsworth v. S & W Pallet
W1998-00857-SC-WCM-CV
Authoring Judge: Adolpho A. Birch, Jr., J.
Trial Court Judge: Julian P. Guinn, Judge
In this workers' compensation action involving the Second Injury Fund, the employee has suffered two disabling heart attacks. The first was non-compensable; the trial court found the second compensable and awarded permanent and total disability benefits, with 4 percent of the disability allocated to the second heart attack. The court held that the Second Injury Fund would have been responsible for the remaining 6 percent of benefits, but the statute of limitations barred recovery against the Fund. The Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel affirmed the trial court's award of permanent total disability but held the employer liable for 1 percent of the benefit award. We granted a motion for review before the entire Supreme Court pursuant to Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e)(5)(B) (1997). Primarily, we are asked to determine whether an employer's allegations of a pre-existing condition covered by the Second Injury Fund statute should be treated as an affirmative defense that is waived if not timely raised. We hold that the employer is not barred from attributing liability to the Fund after the running of the statute of limitations. Additionally, the employee asserts that the trial court erred in attributing 4 percent disability, rather than 1 percent, to the second heart attack. We hold that the evidence supports a finding that the second injury resulted in 4 percent disability. In regard to all remaining issues, we adopt the memorandum opinion of the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel affirming the award of permanent total disability and remanding the cause for determination of temporary total disability.

State of Tennessee v. William David Marks
M2001-01497-CCA-R9-CO
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Cheryl A. Blackburn

The defendant brings this interlocutory appeal in which he challenges the prosecutor's denial of pretrial diversion for simple assault and the trial court's denial of his certiorari petition. We conclude the prosecutor properly considered the need for deterrence for domestic violence, the defendant's lack of remorse and failure to take responsibility for his actions, and the seriousness of the offense and its impact upon the victim. However, we conclude the prosecutor wrongfully considered certain factors relating to domestic violence cases that have no application to the circumstances of this case, and wrongfully considered the defendant's depression for which he takes prescription medication. Accordingly, we reverse the order of the trial court and remand this matter to the district attorney general for further consideration in accordance with this opinion.

Brendi Kaplan v. John A. Bugalla
M2003-01012-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain
Trial Court Judge: Donald P. Harris
This case involves a petition to modify child support. By court approved Marital Dissolution Agreement executed May 10, 2002, child support payable by the father was set at $4,000 per month. At the time of the agreement and divorce decree father was earning in excess of $20,000 per month. The parties did not appeal the May 10, 2002 judgment, but on September 4, 2002 the mother filed a petition to increase child support in order to accommodate attendance of the two children to private school. The trial judge denied the petition. We affirm the action of the trial court.

Robert L. Freeman v. State of Tennessee
M2000-00904-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jane W. Wheatcraft

The petitioner originally pled guilty pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement to one count of aggravated assault for an agreed eight-year sentence as a Range II multiple offender. He timely sought post-conviction relief, which was denied by the post-conviction court. In this appeal, the petitioner contends his trial counsel was ineffective, and his guilty plea was involuntary. We affirm.

Alberta Dodson v. James Dodson
M2000-01682-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Muriel Robinson
The trial court awarded a divorce to the parties, and ordered the husband to pay $1,000 per month as alimony in futuro. In light of the needs of the wife, and of the husband's ability to pay, we increase the alimony award to $1,500 per month.

Ricardo Maxwell v. State of Tennessee
W2000-02011-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joe C. Morris

A Madison County jury convicted the petitioner and his co-defendants of felony murder, conspiracy to commit especially aggravated burglary, especially aggravated burglary, and theft over five hundred dollars. See State v. Montez Antuan Adams, No. 02C01-9709-CC-00352, 1998 WL 556174, at *1 (Tenn. Crim. App. at Jackson, Sept. 1, 1998). For these offenses the petitioner effectively received a life sentence. Id. On appeal this Court reduced the especially aggravated burglary to aggravated burglary and announced the corresponding sentence for this offense with respect to the petitioner and each of his co-defendants; however, the remainder of the convictions were affirmed, and the effective sentence remained the same. Id. at *1, *9. Subsequently, the petitioner filed a pro se post-conviction petition and received appointed counsel thereon. At the evidentiary hearing on this petition, the petitioner unsuccessfully pursued an ineffective assistance of counsel claim. Through this appeal he continues to aver that he received ineffective assistance because counsel did not fully discuss potential trial tactics and strategies with him, thereby depriving him of the opportunity to aid in his defense. After considering this matter, we determine that the petitioner has failed to prove that this claim merits relief. As such, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's post-conviction petition.

State of Tennessee v. Kenneth Javon Bills
W2001-00396-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Jon Kerry Blackwood

The Defendant, Kenneth Javon Bills, was convicted by a jury of attempted second degree murder and aggravated assault. He was sentenced as a Range I standard offender to ten years for the attempted murder and four years for the aggravated assault, to be served concurrently in the Department of Correction. In this direct appeal, the Defendant raises the following issues: (1) whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his convictions; (2) whether double jeopardy principles require dismissal of his aggravated assault conviction; (3) whether the trial court erred by admitting certain rap lyrics authored by the Defendant; and (4) whether his sentence is excessive. Finding that double jeopardy principles prohibit the Defendant's dual convictions, we reverse and dismiss the Defendant's conviction for aggravated assault. In all other respects, we affirm the trial court's judgment.

Michele Beeler v. Southeast Service Corporation d/b/a
2001-02527-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: Wheeler A. Rosenbalm, Judge
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court found the plaintiff had failed to show by a preponderance of the evidence that she had suffered carpal tunnel syndrome as a result of her work for the defendant. The plaintiff, in two issues, basically claims the trial judge erred by finding the plaintiff had failed to carry the burden of showing she was entitled to recover for a work related injury. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court is Affirmed JOHN K. BYERS, SR. J., in which WILLIAM M. BARKER, J., and HOWELL N. PEOPLES, SP. J., joined. James C. Cone, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellant, Michele Beeler. Linda J. Hamilton Mowles, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellees, Southeast Service Corporation d/b/a SSC Service Solutions and CNA Insurance Company. MEMORANDUM OPINION Facts At the time of trial, the plaintiff was 39 years of age, married and the mother of two children. She had a high school education. The parties agree that the plaintiff has carpal tunnel syndrome but do not agree on its cause. Medical Dr. C. Stanford Carlson Jr. treated the plaintiff for the carpel tunnel syndrome. He testified in a deposition that first she had carpel tunnel syndrome in the left hand with borderline findings of carpel tunnel syndrome in the right hand. The history according to Dr. Carlson given by the plaintiff was that her work duties with the defendant required her to do intensive computer work with fine manipulation of the hands all day long. He understood she used both hands eight hours a day to do the work. Based upon this, Dr. Carlson was of the opinion the carpel tunnel syndrome was caused by the work. When it became clear that the plaintiff did not use the computer all day long and that she seldom used her left hand in the work, a second deposition of Dr. Carlson was taken. When asked in the second deposition whether the correct history, which showed the plaintiff did not use her left hand for data entry, would affect his previous diagnosis of a work related carpel tunnel syndrome, Dr. Carlson replied that would be "problematic." Further exchange between counsel and Dr. Carlson produced the following question and answer: Q. And Doctor, your opinions that the plaintiff has bilateral carpal tunnel is related to her - that her bilateral carpal tunnel is related to her employment with Southeast Services is based on the truth and accuracy of the history that she provided you. A. Correct. ... There's no question but that carpal tunnel syndrome or any orthopedic condition that is produced by use is dependent upon the accuracy of the history and a determination about where the bulk of the use - hand use and the aggravation is produced. Dr. Carlson further testified that there are a variety of activities that can cause carpel tunnel syndrome and rated the use of a key board as being low on the causation list. Discussion The resolution of the case lies upon the testimony of two key witnesses - the plaintiff and Dr. Carlson. Dr. Carlson clearly testified his original determination of the cause of the plaintiff's carpel tunnel syndrome was caused by the plaintiff's work as outlined on the history given to him by the plaintiff. The plaintiff's testimony showed the history given to Dr. Carlson was not accurate. When Dr. Carlson was made aware of the inaccuracy, he testified that whether the carpel tunnel syndrome was caused by the work was problematic, and further testified that the work the plaintiff did is low -2-

State of Tennessee v. Cory James Martin
E2001-00914-CCA-R9-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge E. Eugene Eblen

The defendant, Cory James Martin, was indicted for two counts of rape of a child and three counts of especially aggravated sexual exploitation of a minor. After granting a motion to suppress two incriminating statements made by the defendant prior to his arrest, the trial court permitted the state an application for permission to appeal under Rule 9 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. In this interlocutory appeal, the state asserts that the trial court erred by granting the motion to suppress. Because the defendant was not in custody at the time of the statements and Miranda warnings were not required, the judgment of the trial court is reversed and the cause is remanded for trial.

State of Tennessee v. Shanta LaVett McKinney
W2001-01832-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph H. Walker, III

The Defendant, Shanta Lavett McKinney, pled guilty to one count of automobile burglary; one count of theft over $1000; one count of misdemeanor assault; and one count of theft under $500. He was sentenced as a Range I standard offender to one year, six months for the auto burglary; three years for the theft over $1000; eleven months, twenty-nine days for the assault; and eleven months, twenty-nine days for the theft under $500, all sentences running concurrently. Under separate indictment, the Defendant pled guilty to four counts of aggravated burglary; one count of theft between $500 and $1000; and three counts of theft under $500. He was sentenced as a Range I standard offender to five years for each of the burglaries; one year six months for the theft over $500; and eleven months, twenty-nine days for each of the thefts under $500. These sentences were ordered to run concurrently with each other, but consecutively to the previously mentioned sentences, for an effective sentence of eight years in the Department of Correction. In this direct appeal the Defendant challenges both the length of his felony sentences and the trial court's denial of an alternative sentence. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

John Wayne Slate, Sr. v. State of Tennessee
E2001-01906-CCA-R3-PC
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge James B. Scott, Jr.

The Defendant, John Wayne Slate, Sr., appeals the trial court's summary dismissal of his second petition for post-conviction relief. The Defendant contends the trial court improperly dismissed his petition for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm the trial court's dismissal of the petition.

William T. Tarpley, v. Ron Searcy, et al.
M2000-03094-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Judge Marietta M. Shipley

The Circuit Court of Davidson County affirmed an arbitrator's award despite the opponent's claim of the arbitrator's bias and of erroneous calculations. We affirm.