Volunteer Investments, Inc. vs. Feller Brown Realty & Auction Co., et al
M2000-02644-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Ben H. Cantrell
Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.
A developer who purchased three real estate tracts at auction filed suit to rescind the purchase on the grounds of misrepresentation or mutual mistake. The trial court dismissed his complaint. We affirm.

Jerry Russell v. Bill Heard Enterprises, Inc.,
W2000-00965-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Joe C. Loser, Jr., Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: James F. Russell, Judge
In this appeal, the employer-appellant insists (1) the trial court erred in admitting into evidence the expert testimony of an independent medical examiner, (2) the award of permanent partial disability benefits based on 2 percent to the body as a whole is excessive and (3) the trial court erred in commuting the award to a lump sum, sua sponte. The employee-appellee insists the award of permanent partial disability benefits should be increased to one based on 4 percent to the body as a whole. As discussed below, the panel has concluded the award should be reduced to one based on 15 percent to the body as a whole, payable periodically.

State of Tennessee v. Mario Rogers
W1999-01454-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Arthur T. Bennett

In 1999, a Shelby County jury found the Defendant guilty of aggravated robbery, and the trial court sentenced him as a Range I, standard offender to eight years incarceration. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to support his conviction; (2) whether the trial court erred by admitting into evidence the gun alleged to have been used in the robbery; (3) whether the trial court erred by allowing testimony by the victim concerning the death of the victim's mother; (4) whether the trial court improperly instructed the jury; and (5) whether the cumulative effect of errors at trial warrants a new trial. Having reviewed the record, we find no error and accordingly affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Michael P. Healy
W1999-01510-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Jerry L. Smith
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph B. Dailey

On November 24, 1998, the Shelby County Grand Jury indicted the Defendant for one count of aggravated robbery and one count of aggravated assault. Following a subsequent jury trial, the Defendant was convicted on both counts. On September 30, 1998, after a sentencing hearing, the trial court sentenced the Defendant as a career offender to serve thirty years incarceration for the aggravated robbery consecutively to fifteen years for the aggravated assault. The court also ordered both sentences served consecutively to a sentence for which the Defendant was on parole. On appeal, the Defendant claims that the trial court should have instructed the jury to consider robbery and theft as lesser-included offenses of aggravated robbery and that the trial court should have instructed the jury to consider reckless endangerment, reckless aggravated assault and simple assault as lesser-included offenses of aggravated assault. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.as lesser-included offenses of aggravated assault. After a review of the record, we affirm the judgment of the trial court., we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Eric Phillips
W1999-01800-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge John Everett Williams
Trial Court Judge: Judge John P. Colton, Jr.

The defendant appeals and asserts that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction for first degree premeditated murder. After review, we hold that the evidence is sufficient; therefore, we affirm the defendant's conviction.

State vs. Reginald Terry
W2000-00090-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: W. Fred Axley
The Defendant was convicted by a Shelby County jury of attempted aggravated burglary. The Defendant was sentenced as a Range I, standard offender to three years incarceration. The Defendant now appeals, arguing that (1) in spite of his untimely motion for a new trial, this Court should consider each issue he has presented on appeal, (2) there was insufficient evidence to support a conviction against the Defendant for attempted aggravated burglary, (3) the trial court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offenses of aggravated criminal trespass and criminal trespass, (4) the trial court made an improper comment on the evidence in violation of the Tennessee Constitution, and (5) the trial court erred in allowing in rebuttal proof of other crimes committed by the Defendant. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State vs. Frank Johnson
W2000-00386-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft
The defendant was indicted by a Shelby County Grand Jury for driving while an habitual motor vehicle offender, felony evading arrest, and driving under the influence of an intoxicant, fourth offense (felony DUI), all charges arising from a single incident. The defendant pled guilty to driving while an habitual motor vehicle offender, a Class E felony, with punishment reserved until after trial of the other offenses. Following a jury trial, the defendant was found guilty of felony evading arrest, a Class E felony, not guilty of felony DUI, and sentenced to consecutive, six-year terms as a career offender for driving while an habitual motor vehicle offender and for felony evading arrest, resulting in an effective sentence of twelve years. The trial court also assessed fines of $2000 on each conviction. In this appeal as of right, the defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient as to the felony evading arrest conviction, that the jury should have been instructed as to lesser-included offenses, and that the sentences should not be served consecutively. Based upon our review, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.

State vs. Russell Snider
W2000-01240-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Chris B. Craft
The Defendant, Russell Snider, was convicted by a jury of third offense driving under the influence (DUI). He was sentenced to eleven months, twenty-nine days, with four months and twenty-nine days suspended. In this appeal as of right, the Defendant asserts (1) that he was prejudiced by the video recording of his performance of field sobriety tests because the video recording depicts an unqualified officer performing the horizontal gaze nystagmus test and (2) that the DUI sentencing statute is void for vagueness because it fails to give a person of ordinary intelligence fair notice that his or her conduct is forbidden by the statute. We hold that the Defendant was not prejudiced by the admission of the video and that the DUI sentencing statute is not void for vagueness. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Eric D. Thomas
W1999-00337-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge David H. Welles
Trial Court Judge: Judge Joseph B. Dailey

The Defendant, Eric D. Thomas, pled guilty to four counts of robbery and was sentenced to six years for each conviction. The sentences were ordered to run consecutively, which ruling the Defendant now appeals. The judgment of the trial court ordering the Defendant's sentences to run consecutively is reversed, and this matter is remanded for resentencing on the issue of consecutive sentences.

State of Tennessee v. Joyce Ann Rice
W2000-01766-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge Roger A. Page

The defendant, a construction company payroll clerk, was convicted of fourteen counts of forgery, Class E felonies, and one count of theft of property over $1000, a Class D felony, for utilizing her position at the company to write and cash invalid checks on her employer's account. She was sentenced as a Range II, multiple offender to three years on each forgery conviction, and six years on the theft conviction, to be served concurrently for an effective sentence of six years. In this appeal as of right, the defendant argues that the trial court erred in allowing evidence of her prior crimes to be admitted at trial, and that the evidence was not sufficient to support her convictions. After a careful review, we conclude that the trial court did not err in allowing the State to impeach the defendant's credibility by questioning her about her prior convictions, and that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury's verdict. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Marcia C. Robinson and Sammy Claude Wilson
W2000-02085-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge L. Terry Lafferty
Trial Court Judge: Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr.

After a jury trial, Defendants were convicted of one count of attempt to manufacture methamphetamine and two counts of possession of methamphetamine. The trial court sentenced each Defendant to three (3) years in the Department of Correction for attempt to manufacture methamphetamine and eleven (11) months and twenty-nine (29) days for possession of methamphetamine. In this appeal as of right, Defendants assert that the trial court erred as to whether Defendant, Sammy Wilson, gave Investigator Markin consent to search his truck. From our review of the transcript of the motion to suppress, the trial record, briefs of the parties and applicable law, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Jerry L. Luster v. J. Larry Craven, Jr.
W2000-02217-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Special Judge Cornelia A. Clark
Trial Court Judge: Judge Roy B. Morgan, Jr.

The petitioner, Jerry L. Luster, appeals pro se the summary dismissal of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. Because the petition was filed in the wrong county, we affirm the trial court's dismissal of the request for habeas corpus relief.

Jerry Anderson v. State of Tennessee
W2000-03141-CCA-R3-CO
Authoring Judge: Judge Joe G. Riley
Trial Court Judge: Judge Lee Moore

Petitioner appeals the denial by the trial court of his writ of habeas corpus and writ of certiorari. Petitioner contended in his petition that he previously pled guilty in the Criminal Court of Madison County to the offenses of facilitation of first degree murder, conspiracy to commit especially aggravated robbery, and arson, and received an effective sentence of 60 years. He further contended that court did not have jurisdiction to try him as an adult; his rights to double jeopardy were violated as a result of his transfer to the Criminal Court; and he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel. On appeal, he claims the trial court erred in dismissing his petition without appointing counsel, without conducting a hearing, and by failing to make findings of fact and conclusions of law. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Donnell Booker
E2000-02137-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Mary Beth Leibowitz

The Defendant was convicted by a Knox County jury of aggravated assault, a Class C felony. The Defendant was sentenced as a Range II multiple offender to nine years incarceration in the state penitentiary. The Defendant now appeals, arguing that insufficient evidence was presented at trial to convict him of aggravated assault. Finding no error, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

State of Tennessee v. Demetrius Holmes
E2000-02263-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Richard R. Baumgartner

A Knox County jury convicted the defendant of aggravated robbery, and the trial court sentenced him as a Range I offender to eleven years incarceration. The defendant now appeals and raises the following issues: (1) whether the trial court erred by not granting a mistrial when a detective improperly testified that the Defendant was “well known for home invasions,” (2) whether the state failed to disclose fingerprint evidence in a timely fashion, and (3) whether sufficient evidence supported the defendant’s conviction for aggravated robbery. Finding that the trial court erred in denying the motion to declare a mistrial, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand for a new trial.

State of Tennessee v. Demetrius Holmes - Dissenting
E2000-02263-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Robert W. Wedemeyer
Trial Court Judge: Judge Richard R. Baumgartner

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the majority opinion that the granting or denial of a mistrial is a matter within the sound discretion of the trial court and that a trial court should grant a mistrial only when it is of “manifest necessity.” I would add that the burden of establishing a “manifest necessity” is upon the appellant. State v. Williams, 929 S.W.2d 385, 388 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1996).

State of Tennessee v. Rhonda Grills
E2000-01031-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge R. Jerry Beck

The defendant, Rhonda Grills, was convicted of facilitation of the felony rape of a child less than 13 years of age. The trial court imposed a Range I sentence of 10 years. The defendant was fined $25,000.00. In this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence. Because the evidence is adequate to support the facilitation of the rape of a child, the judgment is affirmed.

Karrie Gentry vs. Bryan Gentry
E2000-02714-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: L. Marie Williams
This is a divorce case. Karrie Beth Gentry ("Mother") was awarded primary residential custody of the parties' two minor children, and Bryan Keith Gentry ("Father") was ordered to pay child support of $2,100 per month. Father appeals, arguing that the trial court erred in imputing income to him for the purpose of determining child support. Because we find that the trial court properly calculated Father's income based upon what it found to be the only credible evidence presented at trial, we affirm.

Pearl Lynell Potts, Indiv.and Executor of the Estate of Gordon Ray Potts, Sr., Deceased, vs. Mary Potts Mayforth, et al vs. Alice Elizabeth Nelson
E2000-03116-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: G. Richard Johnson
The Trial Court entered a Default Judgment against Potts pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 37.02 and then summary judgment for plaintiffs. On appeal by defendants, we affirm the Judgment of the Trial Court.

State of Tennessee v. William Butler Bolling
E2000-03166-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge J. Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge Phyllis H. Miller

William Butler Bolling appeals from the Sullivan County Criminal Court's determination that he serve his plea bargained, effective two-year sentence for gambling crimes in the Department of Correction. He claims he should have received some form of alternative sentencing, preferably probation, for his felony conviction. Because Bolling has failed to demonstrate the error of the trial court's determination, we affirm.

Michael T. Burum v. Bnfl, Incorporated and Hartford
E2000-01383-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: John K. Byers, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: James B. Scott, Judge
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the SpecialWorkers' Compensation Appeals Panel of the Supreme Court in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6- 225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court awarded the plaintiff, who fell at work, permanentpartial disabilityof 5 percent to the left leg. We affirm the decision of the trial court. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Circuit Court is Affirmed JOHN K. BYERS, SR. J., in which E. RILEY ANDERSON, C. J., and ROGER E. THAYER, SP. J., joined. Robert R. Davies, Knoxville, Tennessee, for the appellants, BNFL, Inc. and Hartford Insurance Company. Roger L. Ridenour, Clinton, Tennessee, for the appellee, Michael T. Burum. MEMORANDUM OPINION Review of the findings of fact made by the trial court is de novo upon the record of the trial court, accompanied by a presumption of the correctness of the findings, unless the preponderance of the evidence is otherwise. TENN. CODE ANN. _ 5-6-225(e)(2). Stone v. City of McMinnville, 896 S.W.2d 548, 55 (Tenn. 1995). The application of this standard requires this Court to weigh in more depth the factual findings and conclusions of the trial courts in workers' compensation cases. See Corcoran v. Foster Auto GMC, Inc., 746 S.W.2d 452, 456 (Tenn. 1988). Plaintiff's History The plaintiff, thirty-nine years of age at the time of trial, is a high school graduate. He attended classes at Tennessee Technical Institute and the University of Tennessee where he studied computer science. The plaintiff also served for eight years in the United States Armed Forces working in communications, computers, radios and electrical repair. The plaintiff's job history consists of work as a machine operator, a service desk employee and a paper technician with a large paper manufacturer. The plaintiff worked for the defendant, who contracted with the K-25 facility for waste management, as a waste management employee. On November 2, 1998, the plaintiff was carrying out his duties for the defendant when he fell and twisted his knee. The plaintiff eventually underwent surgery on the left knee. He testified the knee still causes him problems, and he can no longer participate in activities or work as before the injury. Discussion The trial court's decision in this case appears to be based mainly on the testimony of the plaintiff. Where the trial judge has made a determination based upon the testimony of witnesses whom he has seen and heard, great deference must be given to that finding in determining whether the evidence preponderates against the trial judge's determination. See Humphrey v. David Witherspoon, Inc., 734 S.W.2d 315 (Tenn. 1987). When the trial judge sees and hears the witnesses, it is not for this Court to determine whether a witness has so far destroyed his credibility by inconsistent statements that the trial judge is unable to give credence to any of the witness' testimony. The trial judge's finding of fact in this regard is conclusive if there is any evidence to support it. Walls v. Magnolia Truck Lines, Inc., 622 S.W.2d 526 (Tenn. 1981). In this case, the trial court made no specific finding regarding the plaintiff's credibility or lack thereof. We find nothing in the record to undermine the trial court's decision to credit the testimony of the plaintiff. Both parties in this action agreed at trial that a worker does not have to show vocational disability or loss of earning capacity to be entitled to the benefits for the loss of use of a scheduled member. Duncan v. Boeing Tenn., Inc., 825 S.W.2d 416 (Tenn. 1992). However, the plaintiff may provide such proof to the court as a factor for the court to consider when determining loss of use. In this case, the plaintiff testified as to the loss of use of his leg. He stated he did not believe he could do jobs he had previously done; he also testified he could no longer participated in sports_baseball, basketball, softball_as he had previously done. The plaintiff testified he could neither sit nor walk for long periods of time without pain and told the trial court that the injury bothered him "pretty much all the time." The plaintiff's testimony is unrefuted; the defendants offered no rebuttal proof at trial regarding the plaintiff's testimony about his vocational prospects -2-

Danny Middleton v. Porcelain Products Company
E2000-01464-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Howell N. Peoples, Special Judge
Trial Court Judge: Daryl Fansler, Chancellor
The employee appeals and contends the trial court erred (1) in finding his medical impairment to be eleven percent instead of eighteen percent to the body, (2) in concluding that he has employment opportunities available locally, and (3) in failing to consider economic feasibility in determining local employment opportunities. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

State of Tennessee v. Kenneth S. Griffin
E2000-02471-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Thomas T. Woodall
Trial Court Judge: Judge Ray L. Jenkins

Defendant, Kenneth Griffin, was found guilty of burglary (Class D) and theft (Class D) following a bench trial. He was sentenced as a career offender on each conviction to twelve (12) years incarceration, and the sentences were ordered to be served consecutively. The Defendant, with counsel, appealed the conviction raising the sole issue of the sufficiency of the evidence. This court affirmed. State v. Kenneth S. Griffin, C.C.A. No. 03C01-9811-CR-00406, 1999 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 1316, Knox County (Tenn. Crim. App., Knoxville, Dec. 27, 1999). Subsequently, Defendant timely filed a petition for post-conviction relief alleging, apparently among other issues, that he received ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal because appellate counsel did not raise as an issue the consecutive sentencing ordered by the trial court. The post-conviction court, in a written order, granted Defendant a "delayed appeal" as "authorized under TENNESSEE CODE ANNOTATED SECTION. 40-30-213." The post-conviction court's order limited the delayed appeal to the sole issue "of the correctness of [defendant's] sentence." However, the post-conviction court, while impliedly finding ineffective assistance of counsel for not raising the sentencing issue on direct appeal, made no finding that the Petitioner was prejudiced by the deficient representation. In any event, we find that the granting of a delayed appeal from the original conviction is not authorized by statute, and accordingly, this appeal from the sentence imposed in the original convictions is dismissed.

Tonya Sexton vs. Hartco Flooring Co.
E2000-02489-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Billy Joe White
The Trial Court granted defendant summary judgment on plaintiff's claims of sexual harassment and retaliatory discharge from employment. On appeal, we affirm judgment on the sexual harassment claim, but vacate and remand on claim of retaliatory discharge.