Opinions

Phung vs. Case
03A01-9811-CV-00388

Phung vs. Case
03A01-9811-CV-00388

Bok vs. State
03A01-9812-BC-00426

Charles Conner vs. Cynthia Conner
02A01-9809-CH-00251
Trial Court Judge: D. J. Alissandratos

State vs. Matt Kroll
03C01-9808-CR-00283

X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX

John O. Peoples v. A&M Express, Inc. & Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance
01S01-9801-CH-00007
Authoring Judge: Per Curiam
Trial Court Judge: Hon. Tyrus

Richards vs. Read
01A01-9708-PB-00450
Trial Court Judge: Frank G. Clement, Jr.

Oakley vs. Lang
01A01-9809-CH-00496
Trial Court Judge: Tom E. Gray

Sears vs. Metro Nashville Airport
01A01-9703-CV-00138
Trial Court Judge: Thomas W. Brothers

Richards vs. Read
01A01-9708-PB-00450

Howell vs. Howell
01A01-9806-CV-00301
Trial Court Judge: Lee Russell

Lewis vs. Lewis
01A01-9809-CH-00469
Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano

Montgomery Co. vs. Nichols
01A01-9807-CV-00343
Trial Court Judge: James E. Walton

State, ex rel City of Lafayette vs. Mowell
01A01-9810-CV-00520
Trial Court Judge: Bobby H. Capers

State vs. Fred Fulgenzi
02C01-9802-CR-00038
Trial Court Judge: James C. Beasley, Jr.

State vs. Fred Fulgenzi
02C01-9802-CR-00038

Joseph Beaucamp v. Board of Paroles, et al.
M1998-00960-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge William C. Koch, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Ellen Hobbs Lyle
This appeal involves a dispute between a prisoner and the Tennessee Board of Paroles over the prisoner's right to sentence credits against his Tennessee conviction for time served in Arkansas penal institutions. After the Board declined to give him credit for this time, the prisoner filed a petition for common-law writ of certiorari in the Chancery Court for Davidson County asserting that the Board had acted illegally by refusing to abide by the terms of his Arkansas sentence. The trial court dismissed the petition, and the prisoner has appealed. We affirm the dismissal of the petition because Tennessee is not bound by the terms of the criminal sentences imposed by the courts of Arkansas.

James Mims vs. Pamela Mims
W2001-01688-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Alan E. Highers
Trial Court Judge: Daniel L. Smith
This appeal arises from a trial court's refusal to modify a custody agreement or increase child support obligations. A divorced father of three children petitioned the court to hold the mother in contempt and change the custody agreement embodied in a marital dissolution agreement from joint custody to primary or sole custody of the children by him. The mother counterpetitioned seeking to have the father held in contempt and to have child support increased. The trial court found that no material change in circumstances warranting a change in custody existed and refused to increase the father's child support obligations for lack of proof. For the following reasons, we affirm

State vs. Richard Reagan
03C01-9901-CC-00019
Trial Court Judge: D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.

03C01-9802-CR-00063
03C01-9802-CR-00063
Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown

State vs. Mikie Ash
01C01-9710-CC-00502
Trial Court Judge: John H. Gasaway, III

Richard Anthony vs State
01C01-9903-CC-00082

James Shields vs. State
01C01-9809-CR-00383

State vs. Reginald Cobb
01C01-9810-CC-00401