Tennessee Administrative Office of the Courts

COURT

County

Authoring Judge

Originating Judge

Date Filter

Case Number

Case Name

Keyword Search

Sort by

Order

Gary Harris vs. State 03C01-9803-CR-00085 Trial Court Judge: Lynn W. Brown	Unicoi	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/15/99
Greg Morgan vs. State 03C01-9611-CR-00404 Trial Court Judge: Mayo L. Mashburn	Bradley	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/15/99
State vs. Strickland 03C01-9801-CC-00556	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/15/99
State vs. Wembley 03C01-9803-CC-00088	Blount	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/15/99
Brooks vs Brooks, Jr. 03A01-9801-CH-00008		Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Alexander vs Armentrout, Jr. 03A01-9807-CV-00205	Washington	Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Spruce vs Spruce 03A01-9807-CV-00211	Knox	Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Clark & Associates Architects, Inc. vs. Lewis 01A01-9802-CH-00088 Trial Court Judge: Carol A. Catalano	Montgomery	Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Edmondson vs. Solomon 01A01-9802-CV-00097 Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz	Davidson	Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Hampton vs. TN Truck Sales 01A01-9712-CH-00721 Trial Court Judge: Irvin H. Kilcrease, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Sara Evelyn Evans (Young) v. Bobby Hugh Young, D.K. Hailey Wrecking Company, Inc. and Levy Industrial Contractors, Inc. 01A01-9711-CV-00638 Authoring Judge: Judge David R. Farmer Trial Court Judge: Judge Muriel Robinson Intervenors D. K. Hailey WreckingCompany (Hailey Wrecking) and Levy Industrial Contractors, Inc. (Levy Industrial) appeal an order of the trial court requiring them to pay the attorney fees of Plaintiff Sara Evelyn Evans incurred in a proceeding to enforce a judgment obtained by Ms. Evans against Bobby Hugh Young. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the ruling of the trial court.	Davidson	Court of Appeals	01/14/99
Palmer vs. So. Central Correctional Facility Disciplinary Bd. M1999-01611-COA-R3-CV Authoring Judge: Judge William B. Cain Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Holloway Petitioner, an incarcerated prisoner at South Central Correctional Facility, appeals the dismissal by the trial court of his petition for a writ of certiorari to review a disciplinary decision made by the Correctional Facility Disciplinary Board and approved by the Tennessee Department of Correction ("T.D.O.C."). The defendant filed a Rule 12.02(6), Tenn. R. Civ. P., motion asserting the failure of Petitioner to state a claim for which relief may be granted. The trial court sustained this motion to dismiss. We reverse.	Wayne	Court of Appeals	01/13/99
State vs. Roy Keough 02C01-9708-CR-00317	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/13/99
State vs. Grace Matthews 02C01-9801-CR-00013	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/13/99
State vs. Aaron Carroll 02C01-9805-CR-00140 Trial Court Judge: Bernie Weinman	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/13/99
R & E Properties vs Jones 03A01-9804-CV-00133		Court of Appeals	01/13/99
Woods vs Walldorf 03A01-9803-CH-00085		Court of Appeals	01/13/99
State vs. Connie Wilson 02C01-9706-CC-00217	Madison	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/13/99
State vs. Howard Epps 02C01-9710-CR-00410	Shelby	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/13/99
State vs. Pamela Scuderi 01C01-9803-CC-00135 Trial Court Judge: James K. Clayton, Jr.	Rutherford	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/12/99
Memphis Housing Auth. vs. Ramona Stewart 02a01-9803-CV-00087 Trial Court Judge: Robert L. Childers	Shelby	Court of Appeals	01/12/99
Bryant vs. McCord, et al 01A01-9801-CV-00046 Trial Court Judge: Walter C. Kurtz	Davidson	Court of Appeals	01/12/99
01A01-9805-CH-00258 01A01-9805-CH-00258 Trial Court Judge: Allen W. Wallace	Dickson	Court of Appeals	01/12/99
George French vs. State, Ricky Bell, Warden 01C01-9801-CR-00022 Trial Court Judge: J. Randall Wyatt, Jr.	Davidson	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/12/99
State vs. Christopher Bengston E1999-01190-CCA-R3-CD Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn Trial Court Judge: R. Steven Bebb The defendant, Christopher Bengtson, was convicted by a McMinn County jury of three counts of reckless endangerment committed with a deadly weapon, a Class E felony. In this appeal as of right, the defendant raises two issues: (1) whether the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict; and (2) whether the trial court erred in failing to merge the three counts into one. We conclude that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law for the jury to conclude beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was guilty of felony reckless endangerment. We agree with the defendant and the State that the three counts constituted a single course of conduct and should have been merged into one. We therefore affirm the felony reckless endangerment conviction for count one of the indictment but vacate the convictions for counts two and three.	McMinn	Court of Criminal Appeals	01/12/99