Edmondson vs. Solomon
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Clark & Associates Architects, Inc. vs. Lewis
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Brooks vs Brooks, Jr.
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Alexander vs Armentrout, Jr.
|
Washington | Court of Appeals | |
Spruce vs Spruce
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Palmer vs. So. Central Correctional Facility Disciplinary Bd.
|
Wayne | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Roy Keough
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Connie Wilson
|
Madison | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Howard Epps
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Grace Matthews
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Aaron Carroll
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Woods vs Walldorf
|
Court of Appeals | ||
R & E Properties vs Jones
|
Court of Appeals | ||
State vs. Christopher Bengston
|
McMinn | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Bryant vs. McCord, et al
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
01A01-9805-CH-00258
|
Dickson | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Pamela Scuderi
|
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
George French vs. State, Ricky Bell, Warden
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Memphis Housing Auth. vs. Ramona Stewart
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Seals vs. England/Corsair Upholstery Mfg Co., Inc. and 2nd Injury Fund
|
Supreme Court | ||
01A01-9711-CV-00685
|
Montgomery | Court of Appeals | |
Seals vs. England/Corsair Upholstery Mfg Co., Inc. and 2nd Injury Fund
|
Claiborne | Supreme Court | |
Vernon W. Mauldin v. Tennessee Department of Correction
This appeal involves a state prisoner's efforts to obtain judicial review of the length of his incarceration. The prisoner contends that he is entitled to the benefit of the 1989 Sentencing Reform Act’s lesser sentence for armed robbery rather than the sentence imposed upon him at the time of his conviction in 1985. He also contends he is entitled, as a matter of law, to certain sentence reduction credits. Finally, he contends that, taken together, the downward adjustments of his sentence on the basis of these two contentions would entitle him to be immediately released from custody. He filed a Petition for Declaratory Order with the Department of Correction, and the Department denied him relief. Thereafter, the prisoner filed a pro se "Petition for Judicial Review and/or Petition for a Declaratory Judgment and/or Petition for Common-law Writ of Certiorari" in the Chancery Court of Davidson County. The trial court granted the Department's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. We affirm the dismissal of the prisoner's petition because it fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee vs. Craig Bryant
The Defendant, Craig Bryant, appeals as of right from a Shelby County jury verdict convicting him of aggravated assault and attempted second degree murder. The trial court sentenced him as a Range I standard offender to consecutive sentences of three years for aggravated assault and ten years for attempted second degree murder. The Defendant now appeals pursuant to Rule 3 of the Tennessee Rules of Appellate Procedure. W e affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Larry Aubrey Henson, v. Elizabeth Ellen Sorrell - Concurring/Dissenting
I write separately only to indicate disagreement with an inference that may be drawn from the majority opinion. The last sentence in the opinion states that a party such as Henson may recover damages immediately flowing from the wrongful conduct, as in Smith v. Gore, 728 S.W.2d 738 (Tenn. 1987). As noted in the majority opinion, the plaintiff mother in Smith was permitted to recover in a medical malpractice action for damages immediately related to pregnancy and childbirth. |
Court of Appeals |