State vs. Donald Spicer
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Of This Case Are Analogous To The Facts In State v. Hoyt, 928 S.W.2D 935 (Tenn.
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Danny Anderson
|
Crockett | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Aubrey Brigance
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Williamson vs. Sanders
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Henson vs. Carte r
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Haren vs. Haren
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Deroyal vs. Johnson
|
Claiborne | Court of Appeals | |
Graves vs. Grady's
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ridley vs. Ridley
|
Court of Appeals | ||
McDonald vs. State
|
Bradley | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Mitchell vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Logan vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Smith v. Lauren
|
Smith | Workers Compensation Panel | |
State vs. Roger Kimmel
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Roger Kimmel
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Thomas
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Myron Garmon
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Cavious Watkins
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Roe
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9703-CR-00098
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
M & M vs. Maples
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Porter Freeman vs. Robert Ring, County Executive, Jerry Sharber, Mayor, et al., - Concurring
The appellant sought to enjoin both city and county officials from the sale of general obligation bonds. The Chancery Court of Franklin granted all defendants' motions to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) of the Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. On appeal, we must determine whether the trial court erred in not considering the petition for injunction on the merits as against either the city or the county defendants. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Winslow Watson, v. Tennessee Department of Correction, Tennessee Board of Paroles, CCA, and Jody Benjamin
This is an appeal by petitioner/appellant, Winslow Watson, from a decision of the chancery court dismissing his petition for a declaratory judgment pursuant to the Declaratory Judgment Act, Tennessee Code Annotated section 29-14-101 to -113. The facts out of which this matter arose are as follows. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Demetra Lyree Parker, v. Warren County Utility District
Plaintiff Demetra Lyree Parker appeals the trial court’s order granting the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendant/Appellee W arren County Utility District. We reverse the trial court’s judgment based on our conclusion that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the Utility District responded promptly, adequately, and effectively to Parker’s allegations of sexual harassment against the Utility District’s general manager. |
Warren | Court of Appeals |