Gregg vs. State
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Carlito Adams
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Robin vs. Seaton
|
Sevier | Court of Appeals | |
Newton vs. Tinsley
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
State vs. Charles Vanderford
|
Hardin | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pendergrass
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Pendergrass
|
Bledsoe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. John Knapp
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Jose Holmes
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Terri Demilt vs. Methodist Hosp., et al
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Suzanne Gibson vs. James Prokell
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03A01-9708-CH-
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Watson vs. Ameredes
|
Bradley | Court of Appeals | |
Thurman vs. Thurman
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Oneida vs. Oneida
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Tennessee Municipal League vs. Brook Thompson
|
Supreme Court | ||
Keith Scarbrough vs. State
|
Cheatham | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Billy Rippy
|
Robertson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State vs. Bill Teal
|
Coffee | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
McManamay vs. McManamay
|
Court of Appeals | ||
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Roane | Court of Appeals | |
Sprinkle vs. State
|
Hawkins | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Russell vs. State
|
Johnson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Wade Spurling D.C. v. Kirby Parkway Chiropractic, et al
The plaintiff, Wade Spurling, D.C., appeals from the order of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Rule 12.02(6) T.R.C.P. Spurling filed a complaint titled “Complaint For Deceit in Inducement to Contract, Promissory Fraud, Fraud, Intentional Interference With Performance ofContractual Obligations and Breach of Contract.” The complaint alleges that Plaintiff owned and operated Spurling Chiropractic Clinic (SCC). He entered into negotiations with Defendant Michael K. Plambeck (Plambeck) for Plambeck to purchase SCC. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Gloria E. Hill-Evans v. Bredell Michael Evans, Sr.
In this divorce action brought by Gloria E. Hill-Evans (Mother) against Bredell Michael Evans, Sr. (Father), the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ two minor sons to Mother with Father to have reasonable visitation. However, the trial court’s decree further provided that visitation be suspended “until both of the parties and the children have completed a counseling program which is satisfactory to the court, and the court has been furnished a report that the counseling course has been successfully completed. When the counseling process has been successfully completed, the court will consider the defendant’s visitation rights.” |
Shelby | Court of Appeals |