William B. Tanner v. John W. Harris, Jr., Trustee
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2003-00697-COA-R3-CV
|
Chester | Court of Appeals | |
W2003-00018-COA-R3-CV
|
Haywood | Court of Appeals | |
Beverly Margaret Breckenridge v. Mary Loretta
|
McNairy | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-03053-COA-R3-CV
|
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
Joseph Shepherd v. State of Tennessee
Prior to this appeal, the petitioner, Joseph Shepherd, was convicted of involuntary manslaughter in one proceeding, and, in a separate proceeding, he was convicted of felony murder and aggravated assault. He is currently serving a life sentence. The petitioner filed a petition for post-conviction relief in each case, raising several issues, including ineffective assistance of counsel. The post-conviction court denied relief in both cases and the petitioner appealed. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Monroe | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Donald Freeman v. Lynn Freeman
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Brenda King v. Danny King
|
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
W2003-01162-COA-R9-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Charles Larry Honeycutt v. Ann Marie Migliaccio
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Anthony Phillips v. State of Tennessee
The petitioner appeals the summary dismissal of his post-conviction relief petition based upon the expiration of the statute of limitations. He argues: (1) due process required the post-conviction court to hear his petition because of his attorney’s inaction even though it was filed outside the statute of limitations; and, regardless, (2) his convictions should be set aside because they are based on void indictments. We affirm the judgment of the post-conviction court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Oscar C. Wells
The appellant, Oscar C. Wells, was convicted in the Shelby County Criminal Court of one count of first degree murder and one count of especially aggravated robbery. The appellant received a total effective sentence of life plus ten years. On appeal, the appellant challenges his arrest without a warrant and the trial court’s failure to suppress the appellant’s statement which was taken after his arrest. Upon review of the record and the parties’ briefs, we affirm the judgments of the trial court. |
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cynthia Faye Davis v. Terry Reggie Davis
|
Gibson | Court of Appeals | |
Estelle Frame vs. Kenneth Frame Jr.
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Stephanie Sansom v. Lookout Knitwear, Llc,
|
Knox | Workers Compensation Panel | |
Elbert M. Marable v. State of Tennessee
The Appellant, Elbert M. Marable, appeals the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief by the Rutherford County Circuit Court. Pursuant to a negotiated plea agreement, Marable pled guilty to aggravated assault and was sentenced to three years in the Department of Correction as a Range I offender. On appeal, Marable presents the following issues for our review: (1) whether his plea was voluntarily and intelligently entered and (2) whether he was denied the effective assistance of counsel. After consideration of the entire record, we conclude that Marable's plea was not voluntarily and intelligently entered. Accordingly, his conviction for aggravated assault is vacated and this case is remanded to the trial court. |
Rutherford | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Dept. Children Serv. vs. Ericka Everson
|
Dyer | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-02221-COA-R3-CV
|
Court of Appeals | ||
Ursula Wimpee v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
W2002-01945-COA-R3-CV
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Leslie M. Buchholz v. Tennessee Farmers Life
|
Madison | Court of Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. Latrece Jones
A jury found the defendant guilty of criminally negligent homicide. The trial court sentenced her as a mitigated offender to .9 years of unsupervised probation. The defendant appeals her conviction and alleges that the trial court erroneously allowed the improper admission of evidence regarding child restraint laws and insufficient evidence to support a conviction. After careful review, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Kassandra Greene vs. Tarry Greene
|
Hamilton | Court of Appeals | |
E2002-02809-COA-R3-CV
|
Knox | Court of Appeals | |
Marion Mitchell v. Patricia Mitchell
|
Anderson | Court of Appeals |