Paula Van Slyke (Fleming) v. Philp Edward Fleming - Concurring
This case involves the question of whether a custodial parent may claim the benefit of changes in the child support guidelines promulgated after trial on her Petition for Increased Child Support, but before the trial court filed its Final Order. Because those changes were not raised in the proceedings below, we decline to act on them here. Instead, we remand the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Laura Patricia Cutsinger v. Charles Edward Cutsinger - Concurring
In this divorce case, Charles Edward Cutsinger (Husband) has appealed the trial court's judgment which awarded Laura Patricia Cutsinger (Wife) a thirty percent (30%) interest as a seller in the contract of sale of Husband's chiropractic practice. Husband also has appealed the trial court's ruling which ordered Husband to indemnify Wife for any judgment that might arise as a result of an indebtedness for a pleasure boat purchased during the marriage. |
Robertson | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9306-CR-00188
|
Anderson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9409-CR-00315
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9412-CR-00448
|
Knox | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9408-CR-00294
|
Blount | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9501-CR-00020
|
Sevier | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9409-CR-00315
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Cyril v. Fraser
|
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
01C01-9406-CC-00234
|
Lincoln | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02C01-9412-CR-00286
|
Shelby | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9411-CR-00401
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
X2010-0000-XX-X00-XX
|
Sullivan | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C0l-9307-CR-0022l
|
Hamilton | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
02A01-9409-CV-00174
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9409-CV-00201
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
02A01-9411-CV-00260
|
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
03C01-9311-CR-00365
|
Greene | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
03C01-9409-CR-00316
|
Hamblen | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
State of Tennessee v. David Edward Howington
The district attorney general refused to honor an informal immunity agreement1 made with David Edward Howington, the defendant. The reason stated for this refusal was the prosecutor's perception that Howington had not fulfilled his part of the bargain; that is, he had not testified truthfully at his preliminary hearing. He was subsequently tried and convicted of first-degree (felony) murder; he received a life sentence. |
Montgomery | Supreme Court | |
James R. Fruge and Jane Fruge v. John Doe and Jane Doe
Defendants-Appellees.This appeal involves a suit seeking recovery under the uninsured motorist provision of a liability insurance policy. Plaintiffs, James R. Fruge and Jane Fruge, appeal from the order of the trial court granting summary judgment to the unnamed defendant-appellee, State Farm Insurance Company. |
Shelby | Court of Appeals | |
Edward Rabie v. Hank Hillin, Sheriff
The petitioner, Edward Rabie, appeals from the trial Court's denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus. The single issue presented for review is whether the extradition documents were legally sufficient to authorize the governor of this state to detain and return the petitioner to Kentucky. We affirm the judgment of the trial court. |
Davidson | Court of Criminal Appeals | |
Sherri Mangrum v. Frank Dean Owens
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether defendant, Frank Dean Owens, is entitled to share with plaintiff, Sherri Mangrum, the proceeds of a settlement for the wrongful death of their minor daughter, Lisa Michelle Owens. |
Williamson | Court of Appeals | |
Mid-State Advertising D/B/A The Nashville Scene, v. Douglas Sarmento
This appeal involves a suit on a guaranty agreement. Defendant, Douglas Sarmento, appeals from the trial court's order granting plaintiff, Mid-State Advertising, d/b/a "The Nashville Scene," summary judgment. The only issue on appeal is whether the trial court erred in granting summary judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals | |
Sheryl Lynny Hooke (Thompson) v. Alan Richard Thompson
This matter concerns the custody of Wayne Nicholas Thompson, II, the minor son of Appellee, Sheryl Lynne Hooke (Thompson) ("Mother") and Appellant, Alan Richard Thompson ("Father"). Both parties sought custody pursuant to separate petitions for divorce.1 The final divorce decree awarded custody to Mother, but stated that Father was to have physical possession of the child during the time period in which Mother underwent treatment for alcoholism. The decree provided that upon Mother's completion of a treatment program, physical possession of Nicholas would revert immediately to her. Father has appealed from the trial court's judgment, challenging both the custody award and the trial court's denial of his request to discover Mother's psychiatric records. For reasons hereinafter expressed, we affirm the judgment. |
Davidson | Court of Appeals |