In December 1997, the defendant was convicted of the sale of cocaine over .5 grams, a Class B felony, and sentenced to eight years, with all but sixty days suspended, and the balance to be served on probation. In October 1998, his probation was revoked because he was convicted that year of possession of marijuana, criminal impersonation, and contributing to the delinquency of a minor. He was incarcerated for ninety days and again placed on probation, this time in community corrections. In December 1998, another probation violation warrant was issued, this time alleging that the defendant had absconded. In September 1999, his probation was revoked and he was ordered to serve the balance of his sentence in the Department of Correction. Apparently, he was again placed on probation, with the case transferred to Michigan. In April 2001, another probation warrant was issued, charging the defendant with failing two drug screens and attempting to adulterate a drug screen. Following a hearing, the court revoked the defendant's probation and he timely appealed. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Cumberland
Court of Criminal Appeals
Sherry Lynn Hudgens v. Royal & Sunalliance Insurance M2001-02984-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: James L. Weatherford, Sr. J.
Trial Court Judge: J.O. Bond, Judge
This workers' compensation appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tennessee Code Annotated _ 5-6-225(e)(3) for hearing and reporting to the Supreme Court of findings of fact and conclusions of law. The employer appeals the judgment of the trial court awarding the employee 45% permanent partial disability to her left arm. The employee, who was diagnosed with DeQuervain's Syndrome caused by repetitive use of her hands while working for the employer, had sustained a 2% anatomical impairment to the upper extremity and had permanent restrictions on the use of her left hand. The employer contends the trial court erred by 1) granting an excessive award; and 2) finding that the injury was to the arm rather than the hand. We hold that the evidence does not preponderate against the trial court's findings. Accordingly, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed. Tenn. Code Ann. _ 5-6-225(e) (1999) Appeal as of Right; Judgment of the Criminal Court Affirmed. JAMES L. WEATHERFORD, SR. J., in which JANICE M. HOLDER, J., and JOE C. LOSER, JR., SP.J., joined. John W. Barringer, Jr., Nashville, Tennessee, for the appellants, Royal & Sunalliance Insurance and TennPlasco, Inc. Frank D. Farrar and William Joseph Butler, Lafayette, Tennessee, for the appellee, Sherry Lynn Hudgens. MEMORANDUM OPINION Mrs. Sherry Lynn Hudgens, the employee/appellee, was 42 years old at the time of trial, has a twelfth grade education, and has no special skills or training. All of the jobs she has held in the past involved some type of manual labor. She has worked as a dishwasher, hotel maid, custodian and school bus driver. She has also worked in factories and fast food restaurants, and on farms baling hay. From 1999 until 21, Mrs. Hudgens worked in the finishing department for TennPlasco, Inc., the employer/appellant, where she unpacked boxes of parts and loaded these parts onto an assembly line. On January 5, 21, Mrs. Hudgens felt burning and pain in her forearm and wrist area while working at TennPlasco. She was referred to Dr. Paul Abbey who gave her a wrist immobilizer to reduce the pain. Prior to her employment with TennPlasco, Mrs. Hudgens had never experienced or complained of pain or complications with her left wrist, hand, or arm.1 Still experiencing pain, Mrs. Hudgens sought additional treatment from Dr. Robert P. Landsberg, a board certified orthopedic surgeon. On July 18, 21, Dr. Landsberg conducted an evaluation of her left arm and also reviewed her prior medical records. Dr. Landsberg diagnosed Mrs. Hudgens with "DeQuervain's syndrome which is constrictive tenosynovitis in the first dorsal extensor compartment on the left." He found the anatomical problem to be above the wrist, but that it affected the use of her thumb and wrist. Dr. Landsberg assigned a 2% permanent partial impairment rating to the left upper extremity based upon the latest edition of the AMA Guides. On February 21, 21, Mrs. Hudgens was released to return to work with permanent restrictions of no repetitive gripping or squeezing with the left hand. She was laid off on February 24, 21, and has not been called back to work at TennPlasco. Mrs. Hudgens testified that she cannot return to any of her previous jobs because of her injury and permanent restrictions. She applied for eight or nine jobs within three weeks prior to trial, but had not been contacted by any employer. According to Mrs. Hudgens, "Whenever I use [my left arm] a lot, I have swelling that comes up in the arm area down into the wrist and thumb." She can only perform moderate physical activities with her left arm for 15 to 2 minutes before the pain and swelling begins. Mrs. Hudgens testified that before her injury she could feed her animals, mow the lawn, cook, clean, and perform other household chores. She now uses paper plates and cups because she is unable to lift her ceramic plates and glassware. The trial court found that Mrs. Hudgens had sustained a 45% permanent partial disability to 1 Mrs. Hud gens suffered a previous injury to her right arm while working for TennPlasco for which she received a 1% upper extremity impairment rating for loss of strength to her right side. This injury is not an issue in the present case. -2-
Macon
Workers Compensation Panel
David C. Moss v. Feldkircher Wire Fabricating Co., Inc. and The M2001-01634-WC-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Gray, Sp. J.
Trial Court Judge: Iirvin Kilcrease, Jr.,Chancellor
This Worker's Compensation Appeal has been referred to the Special Workers' Compensation Appeals Panel in accordance with Tenn. Code Annotated _ 50-6-225(e) for hearing and reporting findings of fact and conclusion of law. In this case, the plaintiff contends that the trial court erred in (1) concluding that he did not sustain work related carpal tunnel syndrome and (2) in assigning him a vocational impairment of ten percent (10%) to the body as a whole. For reasons stated below we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The defendant, Nicole Beaudion, also known as Nikki Jo Napier, appeals pursuant to Tennessee Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). After pleading guilty to facilitation of especially aggravated robbery, a Class B felony, and agreeing to accept a fifteen-year sentence to be served in the Department of Correction with a 30 percent release eligibility date, the defendant filed a timely Rule 35(b) motion to reduce her sentence to ten years. The trial court denied this motion, and the propriety of this action is now challenged on appeal.
The Defendant, Jeffrey Lynn Murphy, pled guilty to one count of fraud and was placed on probation for three years. The Defendant's supervising officer subsequently filed a probation violation warrant and a hearing was held. The trial court revoked the Defendant's probation and ordered him to serve his sentence in the Department of Correction. The Defendant now appeals, claiming that the trial court should have extended his period of probation, instead. We affirm the trial court's judgment.
DeKalb
Court of Criminal Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Harry Jamieson W2001-02449-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Alan E. Glenn
Trial Court Judge: Judge W. Otis Higgs, Jr.
The defendant was convicted by a Shelby County Criminal Court jury of one count of aggravated robbery, a Class B felony, and two counts of aggravated assault, Class C felonies, based on his participation in an armed robbery of a Memphis restaurant. He was sentenced by the trial court as a standard, Range I offender to concurrent terms of nine years for the aggravated robbery conviction and four years for each aggravated assault conviction, for an effective sentence of nine years in the Department of Correction. He was fined $500 for each conviction. On appeal, the defendant argues that the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offenses of facilitation of aggravated robbery and aggravated assault and by improperly applying enhancement factors to enhance his sentences from the minimum in his range. We conclude that the trial court’s failure to instruct the jury on the lesser-included offenses of facilitation constitutes reversible error under the circumstances of this case. Accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand the case for a new trial.
The appellant, Brenda McKenzie, pled guilty in the Chester County Circuit Court to one count of facilitating the manufacture of methamphetamine and one count of possession of anhydrous ammonia, both Class E felonies. The plea agreement provided for concurrent sentences of two years to be served on community corrections. The appellant moved the trial court to waive or suspend the mandatory fines on both offenses. The court denied the motion and the appellant now appeals. Upon review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Defendant, David Earl Palmer, was convicted by a jury of aggravated burglary and aggravated rape. The trial court sentenced Defendant to five years for the aggravated burglary conviction and twenty-five years for the aggravated rape conviction. In his appeal, Defendant contends that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to sustain either conviction. After a thorough review of the record, we affirm the judgments of the trial court.
The defendant, Ronald David Wallace, Jr., was convicted of four counts of aggravated sexual battery. See Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-13-504(a)(4) (providing that “[a]ggravated sexual battery is unlawful sexual contact with a victim by the defendant . . . [where] [t]he victim is less than thirteen (13) years of age”). The trial court ordered concurrent sentences of eight years. In this appeal of right, the defendant argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions. The judgments of the trial court are affirmed.
Campbell
Court of Criminal Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Antoinette Hill E2001-02524-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge Richard R. Baumgartner
The defendant, Antoinette Hill, was convicted of first degree premeditated murder. The trial court imposed a life sentence. In this appeal of right, the defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and argues that the trial court erred in its instructions to the jury. The judgment is affirmed.
Knox
Court of Criminal Appeals
Kevin Haney vs. Brad Copeland E2002-00845-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Sharon J. Bell
Kevin C. Haney and his wife, Marilyn Sue Melhorn ("the buyers"), purchased a retail business from Brad Copeland ("the seller") for $200,000. When their business failed, the buyers sued the seller for rescission and, in the alternative, for compensatory and punitive damages, alleging fraud and breach of contract. Following a bench trial, the buyers were awarded incidental and punitive damages totaling $99,053. The buyers appeal, arguing that they were entitled to additional damages equal to the amount of the purchase price. We affirm.
The petitioner, Robert L. Wilks, appeals from the trial court's denial of his petition for habeas corpus relief. The trial court did not appoint counsel. In this appeal of right, the petitioner alleges that the trial court erred by denying the appointment of counsel and by entering the order of summary dismissal. The judgment is affirmed.
Johnson
Court of Criminal Appeals
Elizabeth Whitaker vs. Lawson Whitaker E2002-00847-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Jacqueline E. Schulten
In this post-divorce case, Lawson S. Whitaker, III ("Father") filed a complaint against Elizabeth Donahue Whitaker ("Mother"), seeking to hold her in contempt of court for depriving him of visitation privileges and parenting time with the parties' minor daughter, Grace Anne Whitaker (DOB: September 6, 1996) ("the child"). In response, Mother filed, inter alia, a counterclaim for contempt and for modification of the parties' Parenting Plan. The trial court found a substantial and material change in circumstances justifying a modification of the Parenting Plan. In addition, the trial court held Father in contempt due to his failure to follow the court's prior orders and for harassing Mother. Father appeals both the modification and the court's finding of contempt. Mother seeks attorney's fees for this appeal. We affirm and remand to the trial court for that court to set attorney's fees for Mother in connection with this appeal.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
Ferryl McClain vs. Richard McClain E2002-00913-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: John S. Mclellan, III
This is a divorce case. The trial court dissolved the parties' marriage based upon a stipulated ground for divorce; divided the marital property; and awarded Richard Perry McClain ("Father") primary physical custody of the parties' two minor children. Ferryl Theresita McClain ("Mother") appeals the grant of custody to Father. In addition, she raises several procedural issues. We affirm.
Sullivan
Court of Appeals
Prudential Botts & Associates vs. R & E Properties E2002-01827-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: W. Frank Brown, III
In this case Prudential Botts & Associates Realtors, Inc., a real estate agency, sues R & E Properties, LLC, and one of its principals, Paula Ellis, and her father, James Runion, who advised and exerted influence over his daughter in connection with the business of R & E. The suit alleges that the Defendants violated the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act, T.C.A. Title 47, Chapter 17, resulting in damages to Prudential because a real estate transaction did not close as a result of misstatements made by the individual Defendants, thereby causing Prudential to lose a commission it otherwise would have received. After a plenary trial the Chancellor found in favor of the Plaintiff and awarded it $147,000 in compensatory damages; $97,000 in attorney fees; and $45,000 in pre-judgment interest. We reverse and dismiss.
Hamilton
Court of Appeals
Leah Miller vs. Gary Hill E2002-02018-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Charles D. Susano, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Wheeler A. Rosenbalm
Leah Michelle Miller, a minor, was injured while attempting to dismount a trampoline in the yard of a two-story duplex. Her parents, Robert G. Miller and Brenda Gail Miller ("the plaintiffs"), rented the lower unit of the duplex. The Millers sued their landlords, Gary Boyd Hill and Martha Hill ("the Landlords"). They also named as defendants the occupants of the upstairs unit, Steve Cooper and Tanya Caldwell. The suit against these latter two defendants was based upon their ownership of the trampoline. The Landlords moved for summary judgment. They essentially argued that they owed no duty of care to the plaintiffs or their child with respect to the trampoline. The trial court granted the motion and entered a final judgment pursuant to Tenn. R. Civ. P. 54.02. We affirm.
Knox
Court of Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Tina Cunningham E2002-00571-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Gary R Wade
Trial Court Judge: Judge D. Kelly Thomas, Jr.
The defendant, Tina Cunningham, was convicted of two counts of introduction of contraband into a penal facility. The trial court imposed a six-year sentence and granted immediate probation. Later, the trial court extended the original six-year sentence by two years when the defendant was convicted of two counts of forgery, but permitted the defendant to remain on probation. The trial court imposed an effective sentence of four years for the forgery convictions, to be served on probation and consecutively to the sentence for introduction of contraband into a penal facility. At some point, the trial court ordered the defendant to complete a drug program. When she failed to do so, the trial court revoked the defendant's probation and ordered her to serve the balance of her sentence in a community corrections program. When the defendant failed to comply with the requirements of the program, the trial court revoked the community corrections sentence and ordered the defendant to serve the balance of her sentence in the Department of Correction. In this appeal as of right, the single question presented for our review is whether the trial court erred by ordering the defendant to fully serve the balance of her sentence. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.
Blount
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cynthia Lee Bratton vs. Michael Wayne Bratton E2002-00432-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Presiding Judge Herschel P. Franks
Trial Court Judge: Thomas R. Frierson, II
In divorce action the trial court granted divorce, refused to enforce a postnuptial agreement, divided marital property, awarded alimony and child support. On appeal, we affirm.
Hamblen
Court of Appeals
Frances Jones ex rel. Nell Hampton vs. LaFollette Nursing Home E2002-01183-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Judge Houston M. Goddard
Trial Court Judge: Conrad E. Troutman, Jr.
Frances B. Jones, on behalf of her mother, Nell Hampton, sues LaFollette Nursing Home, alleging Ms. Hampton was entitled to damages for improper care given to her while a resident patient there. The Trial Court granted a summary judgment in favor of the Nursing Home upon finding that Ms. Hampton's claim was barred by the applicable statutes of limitations and that she introduced no proof to rebut the Nursing Home's proof that they met the appropriate standard of care in ministering to Ms. Hampton. We dismiss the appeal.
The petitioner was convicted of two counts of attempted first degree murder and three counts of reckless endangerment and received an effective sentence of thirty years. On direct appeal, this court affirmed the petitioner's convictions and sentence. The petitioner now contends that his trial counsel provided ineffective representation. After reviewing the record, we conclude that the petitioner has failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that his trial counsel provided ineffective assistance. Accordingly, we affirm the denial of the petition for post-conviction relief.
Bedford
Court of Criminal Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Tracy R. Pipes W2002-00433-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge James Curwood Witt, Jr.
Trial Court Judge: Judge C. Creed McGinley
The defendant, Tracy R. Pipes, appeals the Hardin County Circuit Court's revocation of her drug-offense probation. The court ordered her to serve the effective eight-year sentence in the Department of Correction. Because the record supports the lower court's actions, we affirm.
Pursuant to Tennessee Code Annotated section 39-13-213(a)(1) (1997), the defendant, Adrianne Elizabeth Noles, was charged with vehicular homicide by recklessness in the Haywood County Circuit Court. She submitted a guilty plea to the charge, a Class C felony, and agreed to have the trial court determine the length and manner of service of her sentence. After a sentencing hearing, the trial court imposed a three-year sentence to be served in the Department of Correction. Aggrieved of the trial court’s rejection of any sentencing alternative to incarceration, she appeals. We affirm.
Haywood
Court of Criminal Appeals
State of Tennessee v. Melvin L. Harper E2001-01089-CCA-R3-CD
Authoring Judge: Judge Norma McGee Ogle
Trial Court Judge: Judge Phyllis H. Miller
The appellant, Melvin L. Harper, was convicted by a jury in the Criminal Court of Sullivan County of aggravated robbery, a Class B felony. The appellant was sentenced as a Range II multiple offender to twenty years incarceration in the Tennessee Department of Correction. On appeal, the appellant challenges: (1) the sufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction of armed robbery; (2) the trial court's granting of the State's motion to amend the indictment on the day of trial; (3) the wording of the trial court's jury instructions regarding lesser-included offenses; and (4) the sentence imposed by the trial court. After a careful review of the record and the parties' briefs, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
Sullivan
Court of Criminal Appeals
Taylor & Fleishman vs. Kenneth Seaton E2002-00075-COA-R3-CV
Authoring Judge: Sr. Judge William H. Inman
Trial Court Judge: Sharon J. Bell
This is a suit to recover a contractual attorney fee. By virtue of circumstances plaintiff Dudley Taylor had the exclusive standing to contest a petition for the involuntary bankruptcy of Taylor and Associates, LLP, from whom defendant and five other individuals had received preferential payments which were required to be returned to the Trustee if the bankruptcy was approved. Conversely, if the bankruptcy was not approved, the defendant and others similarly situated would retain the preferential payments. The plaintiffs had invested a substantial sum with Taylor and Associates, LLP, but had received no preferences. Dudley Taylor devised a plan whereby, for a fee, he would intervene in the bankruptcy and oppose it, and if he were successful the defendant would retain the preferential payments. The defendant proposed a contract by which the plaintiff, for a non-refundable up-front fee of $100,000.00, and a $200,000.00 additional fee contingent upon success, agreed to oppose the bankruptcy as a party litigant. He was successful, but the defendant refused to pay the fee, asserting the invalidity of the contract on various grounds, including ethical considerations. The Chancellor allowed a recovery. We affirm.
